A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Each and every one of us are unique in our own ways, and have our own weaknesses and strengths. As such, the above recommendation cannot be accepted or implemented wholly because the same curriculum may favor the growth some students whereas frustate the growth of others. Detailed analysis of the statement may provide better understanding of the issue at hand.
Even if everyone is unique, we all need some basic curriculum. For example, the curriculum cannot remove English or Basic Mathematics as these are courses that are required by everyone in their day to day life. So, a nation should certainly set a basic or minimum curriculum that is mandatory to all students until they enter college.
However, students also need to be able to add courses to that curriculum specific courses that they want to learn and advance in. No nation should try and create a factory that produces machines in the name of schools. Let us take a situation where this curriculum is implemented. Now, let us take a student who is very talented at singing, taking this curriculum which must be general to accomodate all the students of school and will certainly lack singing classes as its course. This student needs to wait till college to get to the field that she wants to specialise in and this will certainly hinder her progress to become a singer.
A nation needs to create uniquely talented and capable manpower and allowing the students to advance in their field of interest and talents is the inly way that a country can produced enthusiastic and varied group of individuals in the future. The above recommendation when implemented can hinder growth of special diamonds whose talent or interest cannot be advanced by the general courses provided in the same national curriculum and the nation is certain to lose some amazing individuals when they come out of school.
Moreover, individuals may even face varios problems like identity crisis and depression that when made worse could even lead to suicide when the curriculum which is not suited to them is forced upon them. Providing a nation wide same curriculum is simply assuming that each and every individual is similar. It is like saying Pele could become a professional singer and Ed sheeran could become a professional soccer that too without getting proper guidelines in their filed of interest until they enter college.
In conclusion, I must add that the above recommendation will likely do more bad than good and must not be implemented before revision. A nation can implement a minimum curriculum that each individual must study but should also allow each individual to pursue their own interests and talents by providing schools and individuals to add to that minimum curriculum.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | AlmeeC. | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lekuleku | 62 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | nikhil40507 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | greuela001 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | vineel | 58 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: EACH_AND_EVERY[1]
Message: Consider using 'Each one'.
Suggestion: Each one
Each and every one of us are unique in our own ways, and h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
... learn and advance in. No nation should try and create a factory that produces machines...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 218, Rule ID: NATION_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nationwide'?
Suggestion: nationwide
...o them is forced upon them. Providing a nation wide same curriculum is simply assuming that...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, whereas, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2294.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 457.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01969365427 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73670857179 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487964989059 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 737.1 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1206760673 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.444444444 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3888888889 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345055422904 0.243740707755 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104613452627 0.0831039109588 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109277891366 0.0758088955206 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167845140112 0.150359130593 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0846250367322 0.0667264976115 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.