Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
With the development of technology, the amount of information that people can get has increased. Personally, I think that in order to be informed properly, citizens should listen to a variety of sources of information. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, if people watch only one television program, they are at risk to be deceived. These days, politicians tend to financially support news` programs and they decide what kind of information will be represented on a channel. As a result, sometimes, journalists are biased and report stories that they are paid for. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. A few months ago, my country faced presidential elections and one of the news companies on local television was constantly praising one of the candidates. It became known later that this company was sponsored by this applicant and narrated misleading stories regarding his background. Fortunately, I have read on the Internet many controversial articles about this person and did not vote for him. This situation illustrates the importance of being open to a variety of sources of information.
Furthermore, there are a lot of amateurs around the Internet, who write articles about different kind of events. They have not enough knowledge on the topic and are not able to represent the information deeply and in detail. For instance, a few weeks ago a major snowstorm happened in my town and a myriad of roads was closed for personal vehicles to drive on. Unluckily, I had to be at work this day and so, I decided to check which ways were available for drivers to commute. I read on the Internet that one road was open and moved in this direction. How disappointed I was to find out that the person who wrote the comment on the web had no idea about a real traffic situation in the area. As a result, I got stuck in a traffic jam and was late for work. If I had taken my time and checked with other sources of information, I would not have had such a terrible experience.
In a conclusion, I strongly believe that it is pivotal to obtain information from many resources. This is because it can prevent from being deceived, and will help to avoid troubles.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use specific reasons and examples to supp 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to work in a large company than in a small one. 70
- A company has announced that it wishes to build a large factory nearyour community. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this newinfluence on your community. Do you support or oppose the factory?Explain your position. 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eived, and will help to avoid troubles.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, regarding, so, as to, for instance, i feel, i think, kind of, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1859.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 390.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76666666667 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90263771765 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548717948718 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.9965984169 48.9658058833 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.5238095238 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142606481859 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0442807578829 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040890850784 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104397126755 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373072794724 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.