The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The mentioned bar chart illustrates the information about the proportion of British people providing fund to charity by different age group in two different years: 1990 and 2010.
Overall, there is a slight drop in the rate of British people providing funds to 18-25, 26-35 and 36-50 age groups in 2010 rather than in 1990. However, there is slow increase of rate in two different age groups in the year 2010.
As it can be seen in the graph that the highest proportion of British people gave funds to the age group 36-50 in the year 1990 while it was just 35% in the year 2010. However, a opposite pattern can be seen with that of 51-65 age group with a rate of 35% and 40% in the year 1990 and 2010 respectively.
Furthermore, it is evident that the age group of 26-35 had accounted for slightly above 30% in 1990 whereas it was nearly below 25% in the year 2010.In contrast, it had opposite trend with that of age group above 65 with a figure of slightly more than 30% in 1990 and 35% in the year 2010. Likewise, it was nearly about 15% and 8% with that of 18-25 age groups which was the least proportion in all age group.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-17 | Fenny Mahara | 61 | view |
| 2019-01-26 | damladogan | 11 | view |
| 2019-01-14 | MilanT | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-21 | peeradonn | 73 | view |
| 2018-10-12 | dutahi | 67 | view |
- In many cities today most people live in large apartment blocks Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or more disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 82
- The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and mak 73
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in English who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 200 and 2010 72
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think it is better to work for different organisations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...fferent age groups in the year 2010. As it can be seen in the graph that the hi...
^^
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...was just 35% in the year 2010. However, a opposite pattern can be seen with that ...
^
Line 7, column 150, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...t was nearly below 25% in the year 2010.In contrast, it had opposite trend with th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, likewise, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.37264150943 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29054486173 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.424528301887 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.0377432308 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.428571429 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2857142857 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205908596171 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120723077975 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514105065446 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154502441508 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037156196114 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.87 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.66 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.69 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.