The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
The chart illustrates the percentage of people who donated to charity in the UK, divided in five age bands, in 1990 and 2010.
Overall, the percentage shaply increases in both 1990 and 2010 from the first age range (18-25 years old), which is the group who donated the least money, to third (36-50) and the fourth (50-65) category in 1990 and 2010 respectively.
In 1990, the first three categories donated much more than the counterpart of twenty years later, with the biggest difference (around 10%) for people around teenage (18-25). In 2010 also, the proportion of donators remarkably changes by around 15% between the first two.
On the other hand, the highest percentage of donators is reached in 1990 with around 43% by people of 36-50 band, as opposed to the peak of 2010 which is slighly less than 40% for the fourth range. However, when it comes to people over 65, there is a downward trend in 1990 as well as in 2010, with 2010 having a higher figure by 35%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | CharanpreetSingh | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | exdiscipulus | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | manaswi.ielts | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | azizkhon | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | Zuna-ira | 67 | view |
- Telephone calls in the UK from 1995 to 2002. 78
- Sunlight and Temperature in three major Cities. 61
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone call in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting a reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone call in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting a reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Telephone calls 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, third, well, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 799.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64534883721 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28785533729 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563953488372 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 214.2 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.6420952316 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.166666667 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6666666667 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 5.23603664747 229% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287006379693 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150780576213 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800549997358 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193738410109 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676715904389 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 76.9 61.2550243902 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.