The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in future. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, the ability to speak more than one language has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the world, which leads to a moot question “whether learning numerous language is important or not?”. It is a widely held view that the capability of knowing multiple languages is highly beneficial, whereas I tend to believe that one must carefully weigh up the pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, it is a common belief that speaking more than one language plays a vital role in the world of cut-throat competition. Therefore, I express several reasons why I support this idea. First and foremost is that being monolingual contribute you to share your knowledge and technology with other countries. Secondly, it can be argued that you will be able to raise your public awareness in terms of other countries’ culture, attitudes. In addition to this information, it should be mentioned that foreign students have this opportunity to study in other areas with a different language as well as the job opportunity is available for those who know more than one language.
However, there is no doubt that the ability to know more than one language provides people with various negative points. It should be taken into account that opponents assume young people might forget their mother tongue. Moreover, speaking other languages might endanger the culture, attitudes, and native traditions. Avery tangible example to illustrate would be the India that the majority of people have been affected the western culture.
To recapitulate, I entirely agree that learning more than one language in order to enrich our relationship with developed countries must be taken into consideration. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-29 | sakthivel Kandavelu | 77 | view |
| 2019-06-29 | sakthivel Kandavelu | 77 | view |
| 2019-05-26 | msgnaneswaran | 11 | view |
| 2019-05-07 | AdeelMuhammad | 77 | view |
| 2019-04-06 | mohab.elhaddad | 85 | view |
- Information revolution has changed the ways of mass communication andhas some negative and positive effects on individual’s lives as well as onsociety. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 84
- Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss pros and cons of change in communication. 36
- There are a lot of inventions nowadays, which invention do you think is more important in our day-to-day life. What are the benefits and detrimental effects of it? 85
- The use of newspaper will be less important in future. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Explain with reasons and examples. 77
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not. What are the reasons for that? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 66, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...speak more than one language has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, whereas, in addition, no doubt, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 20.9802955665 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 301.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29235880399 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89392227785 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601328903654 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7980987116 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.538461538 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4615384615 7.25397266985 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328408722656 0.242375264174 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104501556181 0.0925447433944 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833552274471 0.071462118173 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188200019984 0.151781067708 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267045433157 0.0609392437508 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.