Schools are spending more time teaching traditional subjects such as history. Some people think they should rather spend more time in teaching skills that can help students find a job. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that, today, most of the schools have been focused much on teaching conventional subjects. However, some believe that imbibing job-related skills would be more important for children. At this juncture, I believe that the latter view is more advantageous than the first one owing to following reasons.
To begin with, school is the right place to inculcate job related skills which are essential for the children in the future. To be more precise, when a person engages in a work place, skills such as team work, co-ordination, management and communication are imperative since these sources could not be learned in a day. Thus, it is reasonable to say that spending more time for job related subjects are beneficial in schools.
Another justification is that,teaching job focused subjects help pupils to set their job profile in the future. This would mean that, children would learn how to prepare their curriculum vitae or a covering letter according to the standards of the employers. In fact, children would get a great exposure to the job requirements in-advance from the school.
In reality, schools are trying to give much emphasis on traditional subjects. They do so, because traditional subjects are considered as a way to conserve our culture and traditions. Even if it is so, in my opinion subjects related to job skills are more better than the conventional ones.
To conclude, I reiterate that, though teaching traditional subjects in schools are beneficial, I believe that schools should focus more on subjects that can improve the job skills among children. Hopefully, teachers, parents and statutory bodies would recognise this in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-25 | chau.tb05 | 73 | view |
| 2018-06-02 | Harshani | 73 | view |
| 2018-05-30 | Harshani | 67 | view |
| 2018-03-26 | Bilegsaikhan | 78 | view |
| 2018-01-29 | shrey250021 | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 30, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , teaching
...chools. Another justification is that,teaching job focused subjects help pupils to set...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 251, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...nion subjects related to job skills are more better than the conventional ones. To concl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, thus, in fact, such as, in my opinion, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22140221402 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89170842962 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564575645756 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1588233185 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.071428571 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2952592726 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989935243615 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076681379808 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16255725732 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044162442986 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.