The charts show women's highest education in 1945 and 1995. Summarise the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts provide information about the change in the number of female who could access to school in Someland between 1945 and 1995.
Overall, it is obvious that in Someland, women's education standard was considerably improved with the evidence that the percentage of female who could went to school remarkably increased.
To be specific, in 1945, the charts showed a lower academic level in women with one to fourth of them did not get to the school. In contrast, the figure for people studied in Universities was modest in comparison with others, at only 1%. Besides, the proportions of female who finished primary school, year 6, year 9, and year 12 were at 35%, 15%, 10%, and 4% respectively.
Over a period of 50 years, the situation completely changed. There were no figures for people who did not come to school as well as just finished third grade or 6 years. The number of women studied in universities rapidly rose and jumped to a half in the total. Moreover, a new range of education was appearenced, which is post graduate and accounted for 20%. Besides, the proportion of people learned 9 yeard maintained at 10% while its of individuals studied 12 years went up 20%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | d.baquan123@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | Annnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | CharanpreetSingh | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | CharanpreetSingh | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | Nazmul2426 | 67 | view |
- greenhouse 11
- Total time of phone calls 73
- Imprionment 11
- The maps show the centre of a small town called Islip and the plan for its development.Summarise the information about the main features. 73
- The pie charts below show the membership by percentage of a fitness center in Oslo Norway in 2010 and 2015 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, moreover, so, third, well, while, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77184466019 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71400903411 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611650485437 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0251463697 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111500112314 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444302326814 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485230574482 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0751620544416 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295090151607 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.