Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. Choose which position you most agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences.
Nowadays, placing advertisements in schools has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the world, which leads to a moot question “whether a great resource for public schools is required for funding advertisement or not?”. It is a widely held view that productive advertisement in schools is highly detrimental, whereas I tend to believe that one must weigh up carefully the pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, an advertisement in schools plays a vital role in the fast-changing world. To put into consideration, I express several reasons why I do not support this idea. First and foremost is that students need to promote their knowledge in their eating habits or informing of the beneficiary of nutritional foods while sponsors advert junk foods instead. Secondly, school is a place that pupils must promote their cognitive skills and educational knowledge. In addition to this information, a group of socialists, working at prestigious university conducted that placing an advertisement in schools mislead students to study.
However, there is no doubt that advertising in school provides people with various positive points. It should be taken into account that educational advertisement, such as using the Internet or technology will encourage students to raise their awareness. Moreover, a very tangible example to illustrate would be Canada’s educational centers that children are taught who to use the computer.
To recapitulate, I entirely disagree with placing an advertisement in schools. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-08 | angel_isip | 90 | view |
| 2018-04-30 | masi1397 | 88 | view |
| 2018-04-20 | meenutalwar | 77 | view |
| 2018-04-20 | meenutalwar | 77 | view |
| 2018-04-20 | meenutalwar | 77 | view |
- Is tourism in less developed countries advantage or disadvantage? Discuss your views and give your opinion. 77
- The space travel is fantastic these days and people are very fascinated towards it but there are many environmental problems in our planet that need to be resolved first. What is your opinion? Should money be spent on space travel or on environmental issu 35
- Are the cars damaging the environment? Should the number of cars be restricted to one for one family? Give your views and support your views with appropriate examples. 80
- For a successful company, selling products depends more on company's reputation or it depends more on if they provide discount and free offers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 80
- Xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in the western countries.” According to you what solutions can be proposed by government and individuals?individual? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ng advertisements in schools has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, in addition, no doubt, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57633587786 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26522423357 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645038167939 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8806213763 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.75 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.25397266985 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233847173214 0.242375264174 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749011606627 0.0925447433944 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796011341248 0.071462118173 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125126313355 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0803079956506 0.0609392437508 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.