A country becomes more interesting and develops more quickly when its population includes a mixture of nationalities.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that a nation with diverse nationalities of habitants would be more fascinating and growth more quickly. I totally agree with this opinion and I will elaborate on the reasons below.
To begin with, people from other nations with different culture can enrich the local culture of the country. First, when immigrants arrive, they usually bring their familiar things the host country. For example, in New York city, one of the most popular cities for immigration, it can be found lots of restaurants from overseas such as China, Japan, Italian or Spain, etc. In terms of foods, individuals of a multicultural country have many more choices at dinner time. Second local architecture also benefits from foreign culture. For instance, nowadays it is easy to find a Japanese style outstanding train station or local house using Holland’s style elegant red bricks in a small Taiwanese old town due to the immigration of Japanese and Holland’s architects hundreds years ago.
In addition, immigrants can help a country growth more quickly with their new ideas and business connection in their home country. In the modern economics, innovation is one of the most important factors to success; and individuals who are cultivated with different culture often can think out of the box comparing to locals and provide alternative solutions in business field. Furthermore, if a country wants to keep its fast growing pace, it is inevitable to build trading relationship with other countries. In this circumstance, immigrants with their relationship in these countries and speak those countries’ languages are definitely most precious human asset for the society.
In conclusion, people from the other country can enrich local culture, such as foods and architecture, and bring innovative ideas and business connection from their home country to assist host country to growth faster.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-04 | sou@M | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-11 | Mampee | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-13 | abhushek_saha | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-13 | abhushek_saha | 61 | view |
| 2019-04-26 | vinusharma27 | 11 | view |
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much as information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too invaluable to be shared freely.Discuss both views and five yo 78
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 95
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people feel that entertainers such as film stars, pop musicians or sports stars are paid too much money.Do you agree or disagree?Which other types of job should be highly paid? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, second, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1608.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3779264214 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94896429627 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588628762542 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.2433666055 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.692307692 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15384615385 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107794359093 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437557198345 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426843798296 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0758878966829 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028118057574 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.