A country becomes more interesting and develops more quickly when its population includes a mixture of nationalities.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Ever since the dawn of industrialization, the ethnic landscapes of many developed and developing nations have changed remarkably and a number of western nations these days have more heterogeneous population than ever before. It is often cited that this diversification of nationalities makes a country more appealing and leads to the expeditious advancement. I completely agree with this view and this will be shown in this essay by analysing the copiousness of the culture brought in by different nationalities and how a country can utilise distinct strengths of people from different races and nationalities.
To begin with, higher the number of nationalities in a country, the richer its culture becomes. For instance, people over hundred nationalities reside in Dubai and this leads to the availability of hundreds of different cuisines throughout the country. As a result, Dubai is called the ‘food capital’ of Middle East. This, in turn, attracts tourists from all over the globe who come to explore this richness in the culture in Dubai. Hence, the contribution of having an amalgam of diverse types of people makes the culture of a country more intriguing.
In addition, many researchers agree that people from different countries have different strengths and weaknesses. For example, Singaporeans and other Asians are shown to be better at math, while Africans are known for their strength. Countries such as the United States and the United Kingdom have harnessed these strengths of people from different races to become the global leaders. Therefore, the benefits of having a mixture of citizens in a country’s workforce are obvious.
To conclude, having a mixture of nationalities leads enrichment of cultures and faster advancement of a country. It is hoped that more countries will benefit from this phenomena in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-04 | sou@M | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-11 | Mampee | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-13 | abhushek_saha | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-13 | abhushek_saha | 61 | view |
| 2019-04-26 | vinusharma27 | 11 | view |
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- The chart below gives attendance figures for Grandville Stadium from 2017, which are projected through 2030 after a major improvement project. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 67
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 164, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...d that more countries will benefit from this phenomena in the future.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42268041237 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17481141148 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518900343643 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0774585607 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.714285714 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13829424117 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535103313758 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042021561615 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0931566832873 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337715932787 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.