Some people believe that a person’s intelligence is inherited from the parents,
while others believe that their environment is the main factor. Discuss these
views. Which factor do you think is mostly responsible for intelligence.
The ideas of person's intelligence, whether it is inherited from the parents or the environment factor continues to be widely debated. There are valid opinions on both sides, which I will explain below.
On the one hand, those who support parental inheritance as the main factor claim that people who skilled in music, undoubtedly, mostly come from musicians' family. Scientifically, children's' cognitive is affected by genes of parents especially from mothers, where if the mothers are expert in music, the children would be probably inherited. For example, Bruno Mars, an international singer who was born from a singer mother. Furthermore, it might be said that appropriate manner of mother during pregnancy until postpartum treatment could bring a positive effect on children's brain development.
On the other hand, the opponents of parental inheritance are able to cite evidence from environment where genes of parents have apparently not influenced person's intelligence. The intellectual could grow when children involved in formal schooling. In the societies, it is believed, Attending school early and regularly might enhance cognitive abilities. This is because school activity plays an important role in boosting brain power and memory. Moreover, consuming a toxic substance is apart of environmental factor, where has a significant effect on the decline of cognitive function. The poisonous substance - for instance, alcohol and drugs - affect neurological development and thus affect person's IQ.
Overall, I would tend to side with the opponents of parental inheritance. Although parents inherit the intelligence to their children, The environmental factor still dominates highest.
- The table below shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondaryschool types between 2000 and 2009. 84
- The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries China and India 50
- no 11
- The bar chart below shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities Toronto Madrid Kuala Lumpur and Amman 66
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and waterconsumption in two different countries. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: APART_A_PART[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'a part of' or 'apart from'?
Suggestion: a part of; apart from
...oreover, consuming a toxic substance is apart of environmental factor, where has a signi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, thus, for example, for instance, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71428571429 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08801992735 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.646825396825 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5888849388 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.857142857 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19519442981 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062876496804 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711840967176 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128028106167 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356000702319 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.54 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.