Do you think English will remain to be a global language despite globalization?
Recently, the phenomenon of remaining English as a dominant language while globalization occurs has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of English as a master language is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that it is impossible to replace English with another language as an international tool for communication and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, English as a global language can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that knowledge development as well as technological improvement, are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic examination which discovered statistically approximately 90 percent of scientific articles have been published in English. Thus, the beneficial consequences of English as a global language and society progress apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of communication, English is a language for business and trades. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of being non-development related to this reality that the demerits of speaking in native language pertain to prejudice. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of under developing countries is correlated negatively with a preference of speaking in the local dialect. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of English is a prospect for improvement
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of remaining English as a main communicational language far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of using previous knowledge and inventions prove the significance of English, but also pinpoint broaden one's horizon implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-16 | Rafia Jawad | 72 | view |
| 2024-09-04 | Rafia Jawad | 77 | view |
| 2024-06-11 | Sridarani | 79 | view |
| 2024-05-14 | y.yousefi90@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2024-05-14 | y.yousefi90@gmail.com | 77 | view |
- Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 85
- Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant s criminal record This protects the person who is being accused of the crime Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and 76
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss 85
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 80
- As a result of advances in medical care average life expectancy is increasing for men and women Do you think most people will see this as a positive development What are the disadvantages of an ageing population for individuals and society Support your po 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 328, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...e of English, but also pinpoint broaden ones horizon implications.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69178082192 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42280771959 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61301369863 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 379.143842365 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.3878454464 50.4703680194 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.090909091 104.977214359 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5454545455 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308476855607 0.242375264174 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112961757578 0.0925447433944 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779325373184 0.071462118173 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168035084041 0.151781067708 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055815118622 0.0609392437508 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 12.6369458128 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.87 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.