Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additionally funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.
Choose which position you most agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading.
Corporate companies are now increasingly targetting advertising their products in schools, through sponsorships and funded workshops. While some people believe that displaying advertisements in school premises will not be in the best interest of children, others maintain that such a measure will not harm students. This essay will discuss how promotional contents placed in schools be detrimental for children and, therefore, placing advertisements in schools will exploit the kids.
At a young age, most of the children do not have the capability to decide whether a product is good or bad. In this context, if the kids get exposed to advertisements in schools, it is highly possible that children will be misguided. Studies show that the opinion of children influences purchasing decisions of sixty percent households. Under these circumstances, it is clear that placing promotional articles and posters in school will impede the well-being of students.
Despite the evident negative effects, some people think that allowing corporates to display advertisements can give additional funding for public schools. But what they don't understand is that leading companies are already providing millions of dollars to public schools as part of their corporate social responsibiliy initiatives. If placing advertisements in schools are promoted, companies will demand more space in schools for further fundings. So, it will be better not to permit any advertisements inside schools.
This essay discussed how advertisements in schools will mislead children and also will not collect any additional fundings. In my opinion, placing advertisemnets in school surroundings should not be allowed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-18 | Prabu | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-16 | Keiwan | 85 | view |
| 2019-04-27 | topraveesh | 85 | view |
| 2019-04-17 | ajayaryanone | 88 | view |
| 2019-03-12 | ahmedmemon_93 | 77 | view |
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additionally funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.Choose which position you most a 85
- One way to solve the problem of congestion in cities is to build sky trains which run overhead rather than on or under the ground What are the advantages and disadvantages of using this solution to solve congestion 86
- People today rely too much on the internet To what extent do you agree Support your argument with reasons and examples 76
- The claim that animals have “rights” has been the subject of much debate since the 1970s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned? Do you agree or disagree? (72) 55
- As a result of tourism many historical buildings and sites are being damaged beyond repair What could be done to prevent this 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nding for public schools. But what they dont understand is that leading companies ar...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, well, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.75862068966 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7380952381 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19138421889 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8764947238 50.4703680194 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.230769231 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3846153846 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30769230769 7.25397266985 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289639280231 0.242375264174 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107798132498 0.0925447433944 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737065722346 0.071462118173 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188854940988 0.151781067708 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713366726225 0.0609392437508 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.