many young children have unsupervised access to the internet and are using the internet to socialize with others. This has can lead to a number of dangerous situations which can be threatening for children.
What problems do children face when going online without parental supervision?
How can these problems be solved?
Nowadays, lots of young adolescents have unwatched authority to explore various online services and socializing applications to erect their network. However, this practice can preside to diverse jeopardy contexts which can be harmful for off-springs. This essay considers kinds of troubles youth can tackle and few legitimate solutions for such issues.
Firstly, to begin with, the repercussions of the survey revealed that ninety per cent of teenagers use technology independently which has influenced many contradictory effects on both boys and girls. In addition, one utmost problem kids face is child abuse. For instance, teenage girls can be lured easily by the predators with whom they are intercourse as a friend. Nevertheless, newspaper published several child abuse stories on daily basis pertaining to sexual assault and reporting that frequent victims are young kids those utilized social networking sites joined initially for fun but later exploited them to acutest situation. Secondly, another substantial issue is blackmailing and personnel security threat. Innocent children sometimes fail to cope with such terrifying circumstances and perhaps attempt suicide.
Conversely, parents can play a vital role to protect their kids form becoming prey of predators. Further, one eminent measure is to limit the access of socializing sites by installing parent passwords. Nonetheless, have a strict eye on your kids moves and activities visit their room on frequent basis to check upon them. Foster an awareness session and educate them on safety issues and threats.
To recapitulate, despite various challenges our kids face discreetly. In my view, we as a parent are accountable for young teenagers’ safety and security. Close monitoring of children is requisite and fair dialogue can sustain them to be aware of hazardous demerits of using technology.
- With an increasing population communicating via the internet and text messaging, face to face communication will become a thing of the past.To what extent do you agree? 78
- It is often argued that the group of residents’ assume that in learning institutes, an exercise lectures ought to be mandatorily added on daily schedule 80
- Write a letter to the Mayor, the head of a municipal government, complaining about a situation in which some adolescents let their dogs run wildly causing danger. Begin your letter as: Dear Sir or Madam, 73
- These days science developments have encouraged people to stay upto 100 and 200 years. Some people beleive its a good thing while others say it will create troubles discuss both veiw and give your opinion 56
- Write a letter to your English-speaking friend. In your letter:•Explain why you have gone to live in the new city•Describe the place where you are living•Invite your friend to come and see you 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 614, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the acutest'.
Suggestion: to the acutest
...tially for fun but later exploited them to acutest situation. Secondly, another substantia...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, for instance, in addition, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66312056738 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99104383824 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.698581560284 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.9202424754 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8125 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.1875 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259685550113 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696490981303 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512297300639 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146432499427 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554535187367 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.25 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.75 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.