Government is going to provide free public transportation facilities 24/7 to reduce the traffic congestion. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
The topic of traffic congestion is a very important concern for society at the moment. The way that providing free public transportation contributes to reduce traffic congestion is one of alternatives.
We should start by taking a look at expense that government must need to pay. It is good idea that government provide free public transportations for 24/7. Because it will cause more commuters and citizens to use transportation instead of taking their individual cars and congestion will be reduced. Nonetheless, it would be covered by taxes and if more residents take transportation, expense will increase by chance. Also there is a chance to argue by tax payers.
Turning to the second point view, it is helpful to the environment. The environmental pollution is caused by various reasons. One of various reasons can be the cars. For instance, Seoul, Capital city of South Korea, provided free transportation for a day for better quality of air. As result, 2 times citizens used transportation than usual and air pollution improved. Therefore, the government provide complimentary service that public transportations encourage to use public transportation to citizens and will increase commuters.
In conclusion, both arguments have strong arguments. The environment is not seen our eyes but definitely benefit every single of us. Therefore, I totally agree with that government encourage to use transportation by complimentary if government provide proper time schedule and can support enough financial .
- Some people feel that robots are very important to humans future development while others think they are dangerous and have negative effects on the society Discuss both views and give your own opinion 57
- Government is going to provide free public transportation facilities 24 7 to reduce the traffic congestion To what extend do you agree or disagree 69
- Some people spend a lot of money attending cultural or sports events. Is it a good or a bad thing? Give your opinion and examples from your own experience. 61
- You took an elderly friend, who was not able to walk properly, to a museum and he faced many problems. Write a letter to the manager to let him know about the problems faced and what can be done to avoid those problems. 73
- You took an elderly friend, who was not able to walk properly, to a museum and he faced many problems. Write a letter to the manager to let him know about the problems faced and what can be done to avoid those problems. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ation, expense will increase by chance. Also there is a chance to argue by tax payer...
^^^^
Line 5, column 464, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'using'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: using
...e that public transportations encourage to use public transportation to citizens and w...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 192, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'using'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: using
...ly agree with that government encourage to use transportation by complimentary if gove...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 306, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...chedule and can support enough financial .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1286.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 233.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51931330472 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34854080848 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600858369099 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5640303811 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.375 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5625 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243071254811 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761727252377 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106086434335 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150148982207 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358060299804 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.14 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.