Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is a colossal upsurge in the number of packaging products in manufacturing industries which increase the cost of product so this is the responsibility of both producer and consumer to tackle the problem. There is widespread worry that this will only lead to myriad of concerns. In my opinion, this apprehension is warranted and merits serious consideration.
There are number of arguments in favour of my stance but the most preponderant one is that if the producer reduce the packaging it will have mutual benefit for both producer and consumer as price of product will be less which result less selling price to consumer. In fact, Not only product are available in cheap price but also it help to reduce environmental pollution. We can find overwhelming evidence that over packaging can causes environment degradation and makes soil infertile. Needless to say, all the merits stand environment in a good stead as far as reducing over packaging is concerned.
Another aspect of this arguments is that if the producer can reduce packaging then it will automatically help consumer as well producer in terms of cost saving. Besides, environment is one of crucial aspect where the producer and consumer should focus to have global benefit. For example, if the producer use less packaging then it will save time and money for producer as well as it will cost less to consumer and help to improve environment. Hence it is apparent why may are against over packaging of product.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that all the benefits of mutual work of producer and consumer are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-05 | gobindh Singh | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | Mahdi_Farhani | 88 | view |
| 2019-09-12 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-26 | lovepreetdhillon | 85 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | edsonsimoes | 55 | view |
- Do the advantages of these developments outweigh the disadvantages? Discuss. 75
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this ? Discuss with appropriate examples? 72
- Should Age discrimination against older workers be made illegal? 55
- People pursue dangerous activities like skydiving, motorcycle sports, water river rafting etc. Do you support? if yes why and if not why not? 65
- What is the best invention of last 100 years, the computer, antibiotics, the airplane, and explain why? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 234, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun selling is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ce of product will be less which result less selling price to consumer. In fact, Not...
^^^^
Line 2, column 332, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
...re available in cheap price but also it help to reduce environmental pollution. We c...
^^^^
Line 3, column 19, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...kaging is concerned. Another aspect of this arguments is that if the producer can r...
^^^^
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...ple, if the producer use less packaging then it will save time and money for produce...
^^^^
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...nsumer and help to improve environment. Hence it is apparent why may are against over...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, if, may, so, then, well, for example, in fact, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96453900709 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83647160189 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 139.433497537 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475177304965 0.580463131201 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.9 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1630919437 50.4703680194 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.666666667 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.25397266985 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21466602234 0.242375264174 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849984387599 0.0925447433944 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542927451731 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131772504766 0.151781067708 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418721621003 0.0609392437508 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.