In academic studies, grouping students according to academic abilities is good or not good? Give your opinion?
The importance of grouping students in academic studies was always a debatable topic. Some people are in favor of grouping the students and believe that it will improve student's career. Others reject this notion and argue that every student has its own ability to grasp the knowledge. In my opinion, grouping students according to grades is not good. The following essay would further elaborate both the aspects with clear reasons and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
To start with, in competitive era, academic skills play a vital role to make student's career bright. Elaborating of those individuals who are in favor of the stated idea that partitioning of students according to their subjective knowledge, will encourage more and more students to work hard and to improve their academic performance. Moreover, they compete with more desperate manner that leads to fruitful results. For instance, kids who do not pay more attention to studies will eventually start preparing to get in the upgrade mode.
On the other hand, participation may distract student's mindset as they can feel the inferior complexity and starts ignoring the studies. Moreover, it leads to discrimination like high IQ are superior and others are inferior. It also creates differences among students and the outputs from the higher academic team may not reach every individual as they are from low academic students. Combining students may also decrease the motivation of low academic grade people and they start ignoring subjects. Furthermore, pupils of lower grade group can lose their self-confidence for rest of their life.
According to the arguments aforementioned, the grouping of students according to their academic abilities should not be done as this can lower their confidence in themselves and hence, their progress will suffer.
- Workers and nurses should be paid more? what is your opinion? 80
- When you're at the end of your rope, tie a knot and hold on. How far do you agree with Theodore Roosevelt quote. 69
- ageing people good/bad? 70
- University only requires to apply digital media rather than continuously upgrading textbook. Agree or disagree. 80
- Creativity is inborn skill or can be developed through learning? your opinion? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... among students and the outputs from the higher academic team may not reach every...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, so, thus, for instance, in my opinion, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36111111111 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82220547622 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559027777778 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1410398188 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.933333333 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.25397266985 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319640859806 0.242375264174 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109353312794 0.0925447433944 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105435358335 0.071462118173 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197651070027 0.151781067708 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755750616949 0.0609392437508 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.