Arctic deer live on islands in Canada's arctic regions. They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year. Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enough, at least some of the year, for the ice to cover the sea separating the islands, allowing the deer to travel over it. Unfortunately, according to reports from local hunters, the deer populations are declining. Since these reports coincide with recent global warming trends that have caused the sea ice to melt, we can conclude that the purported decline in deer populations is the result of the deer's being unable to follow their age-old migration patterns across the frozen sea.
Argument states that, arctic deer residing in Canada’s arctic regions travel on frozen ice to search for food. Local hunters reports that population of deers is decreasing. Argument concludes that decline in population is due to global warming. Deers are not able to move around for food due to melted ice. There is numerous assumptions in this argument, which can weaken the argument’s strength if proved false. Argument assumed that deers are dying because they are not able to move around due to melted ice. There is no information about hunter’s report covers which part of the arctic regions. Is hunters report coincide with Canada’s arctic region particularly or any other sea.
First assumption is that, deers are unable to move around island to island because ice is melted due to global warming. But there is no data provided in the argument about how deers are dying? According to argument there is no research report showing that they couldn’t make island to island for food and died due to starvation. There could be a possibility that ice was frozen but some of the deers were too old or too weak to travel on ice and they couldn’t make it. Another possibility is that deers were killed during hunting and not died by natural regions which caused lessening the number of deers.
Second assumption is that, hunter’s report covers all the regions of arctic. There is possibility that report covers only areas which hunter’s used for hunting only or this report prepared only by one hunter who went for hunting in some part of arctic region and couldn’t find enough deers for hunting or the area which he chose for hunting was not suitable to deers in that course of year. Argument is lacking in information about hunter’s report, how generalized this report is? Which are arctic regions it covers? Is this report only about deers or about includes other animals also?
Third assumption is that global warming report with which hunter’s report is coinciding with is about arctic regions. There is no information in the argument is that global warming report is about which region, only arctic regions where deers live or all the arctic regions or about all the seas. Argument doesn’t provide any information that global warming report belongs to which course of the year. Is it the same course when deer need to move around for food or any other course of the year. To compare two reports, it is necessary that these report must cover same regions where deers live and same course of the year when deers need to travel.
Thus, in this argument weaknesses are rife. It depends on assumptions which are not supported by enough data and research. Author should collect more information about reasons of population decline of deers and conduct surveys with hunter to gather information about deers population in arctic regions. These data might help to reach to the conclusion why deers population is decreasing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | jenniferjack07 | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | lanhhoang | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | ken10091995 | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | nimesh94 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | farhadmoqimi | 63 | view |
- Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy. 58
- The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 50
- Green tea has long been hailed as an excellent source of antioxidants, powerful anti-aging and immune-system boosting compounds. Many people therefore believe that the more cups they consume each day, the greater the benefits. Green tea, however, contains 50
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. 50
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 313, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'There are numerous assumptions'?
Suggestion: There are numerous assumptions
...move around for food due to melted ice. There is numerous assumptions in this argument, which can weaken the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...e a possibility that ice was frozen but some of the deers were too old or too weak to trave...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'thus']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.268166089965 0.25644967241 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.179930795848 0.15541462614 116% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0899653979239 0.0836205057962 108% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0363321799308 0.0520304965353 70% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0155709342561 0.0272364105082 57% => OK
Prepositions: 0.114186851211 0.125424944231 91% => OK
Participles: 0.0415224913495 0.0416121511921 100% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.62964816748 2.79052419416 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0363321799308 0.026700313972 136% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0588235294118 0.113004496875 52% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00865051903114 0.0255425247493 34% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0311418685121 0.0127820249294 244% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2987.0 2731.13054187 109% => OK
No of words: 495.0 446.07635468 111% => OK
Chars per words: 6.03434343434 6.12365571057 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.57801047555 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.371717171717 0.378187486979 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.224242424242 0.287650121315 78% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.141414141414 0.208842608468 68% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0929292929293 0.135150697306 69% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62964816748 2.79052419416 94% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 207.018472906 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.363636363636 0.469332199767 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 41.0792781644 52.1807786196 79% => OK
How many sentences: 27.0 20.039408867 135% => OK
Sentence length: 18.3333333333 23.2022227129 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.493100697 57.7814097925 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.62962963 141.986410481 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 23.2022227129 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.296296296296 0.724660767414 41% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.58251231527 56% => OK
Readability: 40.7575757576 51.9672348444 78% => OK
Elegance: 1.82835820896 1.8405768891 99% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404763154002 0.441005458295 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.137824653356 0.135418324435 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.118541751849 0.0829849096947 143% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.486146156436 0.58762219726 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.132844994674 0.147661913831 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152816681284 0.193483328276 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760895364693 0.0970749176394 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.429811169048 0.42659136922 101% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.113195670819 0.0774707102158 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282674966785 0.312017818177 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514070298825 0.0698173142475 74% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.33743842365 48% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 6.87684729064 204% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.82512315271 187% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 6.46551724138 62% => OK
Negative topic words: 9.0 5.36822660099 168% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.82389162562 142% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 14.657635468 116% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.