check check
At superficial observation, the adviser letter might seem logical regarding profit and long term advantage in sale of home heating oil in northsouthern United State. However, in order to fully evaluate the argument, we need to have additional evidences. Though, the underlying issue raised by adviser might seem logical, because of the incomplete evidences and unwarrented assumption, the argument is unsubstantiated and deeply flawed.
The first piece of evidence we need to evaluate the argument is whether the owners of home in northeneastern are still using oil for heating or not? It might be possible that, in past, due to absence of electricity they are compelled to use oil as heating. But due to presence of electricity, many of these owners are shifted to use electricity as heating solution. It might be possible that, now they are reluctant to use oil as heating, because of its certain drawbacks like cost factor, side effect in health, spoil the beauty of room. If we found these evidences, then the advisers conclusion will be logically not convincing.
The second piece of evidence we need to require to evaluate argument is information about the competitiors. It might be possible that in past year, there might be new business operations mushrommed over this area. People are accomodested to buy heating substances from other business operations. Due to their cost effectiveness and customery service, people might not be attracted towards oil industries.Furthermore, it may be possible that the population growh is not significant that requires more home. The available homes in that area are sufficent for new increased population. On the other hand, lion's share of the population might have been move to other city in search of new job and opportunities.
The adviser assumes that heating oil is the only solution during winter season. It might be possible that new thick cloths are more useful as compared to heating oil. Furthermore, cost comparision of heating oil might be very high as compared to it's substutites. Regardless of the specific cause, the adviser assumes that, the new born houses require oil as heating solution. They might be build with such technology that doesnot require oil as heating solution.
Clearly, the adviser needs more research to validate his/her conclusion. He need to conduct field survey and asked to people whether they like to have oil as heating option in their home or not. Furthermore the weather trend should be examined more scientifically and logically. The possible alternatives of heating equipements and their comparision with oil should be done more meticulously. As it stands, however, the argument is flawed as indicated.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2016-10-14 | sarinatiwari | 50 | view |
- The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting yo 58
- The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but the general well-being of all its people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developin 23
- Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagre 16
- College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
At superficial observation, the adviser ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s unsubstantiated and deeply flawed. The first piece of evidence we need to e...
^^
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...ting or not? It might be possible that, in past, due to absence of electricity they are...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 580, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'advisers'' or 'adviser's'?
Suggestion: advisers'; adviser's
.... If we found these evidences, then the advisers conclusion will be logically not convin...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on will be logically not convincing. The second piece of evidence we need to ...
^^
Line 5, column 51, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'evaluating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: evaluating
...nd piece of evidence we need to require to evaluate argument is information about the compe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ght be possible that in past year, there might be new business operations mushrom...
^^
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: BUY_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'by'?
Suggestion: by
...r this area. People are accomodested to buy heating substances from other business...
^^^
Line 5, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e accomodested to buy heating substances from other business operations. Due to t...
^^
Line 5, column 409, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthermore
...not be attracted towards oil industries.Furthermore, it may be possible that the population...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...search of new job and opportunities. The adviser assumes that heating oil is ...
^^
Line 7, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es that heating oil is the only solution during winter season. It might be possib...
^^
Line 7, column 237, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion of heating oil might be very high as compared to its substutites. Regardless ...
^^
Line 7, column 327, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pecific cause, the adviser assumes that, the new born houses require oil as heati...
^^
Line 9, column 196, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...as heating option in their home or not. Furthermore the weather trend should be examined mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'regarding', 'second', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.261954261954 0.25644967241 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.16632016632 0.15541462614 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0977130977131 0.0836205057962 117% => OK
Adverbs: 0.04158004158 0.0520304965353 80% => OK
Pronouns: 0.04158004158 0.0272364105082 153% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.128898128898 0.125424944231 103% => OK
Participles: 0.049896049896 0.0416121511921 120% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.04563165608 2.79052419416 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.039501039501 0.026700313972 148% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0623700623701 0.113004496875 55% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.033264033264 0.0255425247493 130% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.002079002079 0.0127820249294 16% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2716.0 2731.13054187 99% => OK
No of words: 433.0 446.07635468 97% => OK
Chars per words: 6.27251732102 6.12365571057 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.57801047555 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.37182448037 0.378187486979 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.311778290993 0.287650121315 108% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.219399538106 0.208842608468 105% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.140877598152 0.135150697306 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04563165608 2.79052419416 109% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 207.018472906 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494226327945 0.469332199767 105% => OK
Word variations: 55.272464655 52.1807786196 106% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.039408867 120% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0416666667 23.2022227129 78% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2636766466 57.7814097925 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.166666667 141.986410481 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0416666667 23.2022227129 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.724660767414 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 15.0 3.58251231527 419% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 49.219495766 51.9672348444 95% => OK
Elegance: 1.76666666667 1.8405768891 96% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.441005458295 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.123658230473 0.135418324435 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.102997695025 0.0829849096947 124% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.516720884623 0.58762219726 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.118162303678 0.147661913831 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.193483328276 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0970749176394 0% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.387224368362 0.42659136922 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0504711142521 0.0774707102158 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.312017818177 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0698173142475 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.33743842365 144% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.87684729064 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.82512315271 104% => OK
Positive topic words: 12.0 6.46551724138 186% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 5.36822660099 112% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.82389162562 106% => OK
Total topic words: 21.0 14.657635468 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.