Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.
Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.
The statement consists of two claims. First, the statement claims that learning will be more effective from a person having similar views with us. Second, there is very hard to learn from a person, who shares the different idea with us. I strongly agree with both of the statement. Learning will be effective from the person who shares common ideas with us because, it helps to make communication better, give incentive and reduce stress.
There will be good a communication if we have got a chance to learn from the person having similar interest. For example, the lab technician will learn from the person whose views are positive with the chemical. If somebody thinks that the chemicals are invented just for the destruction, then, in this case, the lab technician will not learn effectively from such unbeknownst types of the person. Similarly, the public orator likely to learn little from the reclusive type person about how to improve a public speech.
Learning means improving behavior in positive the way. Similarly, in school, if our goal and objectives are to achieve something positive. The Teachers motivation guides us to achieve such achievements as both of us have the same goal. So teaching process will be more effective. But, at the same time, obdurate students will likely to learn few.
Finally, learning from a person having different opinion leads to negative results sometimes war as well. The Civil war in the past of Nepal is one of the examples of it. The consequences of political debate lead to war in severe condition. So, the results of the discussion with the people having a different opinion are not good.
Some people might say, learning from the discussion is better, thinking that: it will gestate some new ideas. However, in a TV interview, we see, the political discussion leads to nothing results, just waste of time and money. In conclusion, learning will be effective from the person having a similar feeling, which ultimately gives the positive results.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-08 | iRohan | 58 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | sushil koirala | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | priit | 58 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | Mohit Raghuvanshi | 58 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | vishucology | 50 | view |
- What are the important qualities of a good son or daughter? Have these qualities changed or remained the same over time in your culture? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- 1.Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated. 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting yo 58
- It might seem logical, at first glance, to agree with the argument in Dr. Karp’s article that children in Tertia actually are raised by their biological parents (and perhaps even, by implication, that an observation-centered approach to 62
- Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagre 16
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'similarly', 'so', 'then', 'well', 'for example', 'in conclusion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.234828496042 0.240241500013 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.131926121372 0.157235817809 84% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0949868073879 0.0880659088768 108% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0580474934037 0.0497285424764 117% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0316622691293 0.0444667217837 71% => OK
Prepositions: 0.121372031662 0.12292977631 99% => OK
Participles: 0.0343007915567 0.0406280797675 84% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.63888963644 2.79330140395 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0290237467018 0.030933414821 94% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.116094986807 0.0997080785238 116% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0263852242744 0.0249443105267 106% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0131926121372 0.0148568991511 89% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2004.0 2732.02544248 73% => OK
No of words: 333.0 452.878318584 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.01801801802 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.58838876751 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.372372372372 0.366273622748 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.273273273273 0.280924506359 97% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.207207207207 0.200843997647 103% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.123123123123 0.132149295362 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63888963644 2.79330140395 94% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 219.290929204 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510510510511 0.48968727796 104% => OK
Word variations: 53.0255545541 55.4138127331 96% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6194690265 102% => OK
Sentence length: 15.8571428571 23.380412469 68% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3429120495 59.4972553346 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4285714286 141.124799967 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8571428571 23.380412469 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.571428571429 0.674092028746 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.21349557522 0% => OK
Readability: 43.1844701845 51.4728631049 84% => OK
Elegance: 1.7619047619 1.64882698954 107% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1128272858 0.391690518653 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.123030495651 0.123202303941 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0911875285528 0.077325440228 118% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.546282861145 0.547984918172 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.134183077136 0.149214159877 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491908494941 0.161403998019 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411194076671 0.0892212321368 46% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.368894308777 0.385218514788 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0514986072957 0.0692045440612 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0785864738433 0.275328986314 29% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344732592708 0.0653680567796 53% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.4325221239 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.