An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be paid subsidies for farming the new variety of millet. Since millet is already a staple food in Tagus, people will readily adopt the new variety. To combat vitamin A deficiency, the government of Tagus should do everything it can to promote this new type of millet.
In this statement, conclusion is that in poor nation of Tagus deficiency of vitamin A can be fulfilled by newly developed breed of Millet. This statement have many things unstated, which should be justified by author.
First argument opposed to the statement is that, Is Millet only option is there for improving the vitamin A? This question needs to be asked because nation which is required to fulfill deficiency, is poor country and newly developed breed is high cost product. There must be low cost option which will help to improve Vitamin A in the body, other than Millet, which is undermined by international development organization.
Second argument is that among people of Tagus, Millet is staple food so they will adopt readily new breed Millet. This will be wrong because country is poor and new Millet is expensive. There will be people who cannot afford this. So, this statement cannot be generalized.
Third argument is that farmers will be given subsidies for new variety of Millet but there is one question in this case. The question is that, is farmer will be able to regain the money invested? And after giving subsidies, there is possibility that still farmer cannot afford it. The farmers will not invest in new Millet if there is no sufficient market, because there is chance of loss.
If above questions be satisfied, then the statement will be perfect. Otherwise, there are questions which are unanswered in statement. So, there is requirement of answering the doubts which is there in statement.
- "The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition."-Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disag 50
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.Write a response in which you discu 50
- "The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in a 50
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 50
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that the person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot per 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...veloped breed of Millet. This statement have many things unstated, which should be j...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'third']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.225694444444 0.25644967241 88% => OK
Verbs: 0.215277777778 0.15541462614 139% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0798611111111 0.0836205057962 96% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0486111111111 0.0520304965353 93% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00694444444444 0.0272364105082 25% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.114583333333 0.125424944231 91% => OK
Participles: 0.0555555555556 0.0416121511921 134% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.62591702369 2.79052419416 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0173611111111 0.026700313972 65% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0625 0.113004496875 55% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0486111111111 0.0255425247493 190% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0277777777778 0.0127820249294 217% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1530.0 2731.13054187 56% => OK
No of words: 255.0 446.07635468 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.0 6.12365571057 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.57801047555 87% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.356862745098 0.378187486979 94% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.247058823529 0.287650121315 86% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.16862745098 0.208842608468 81% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.133333333333 0.135150697306 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62591702369 2.79052419416 94% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 207.018472906 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494117647059 0.469332199767 105% => OK
Word variations: 46.2705234488 52.1807786196 89% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.039408867 80% => OK
Sentence length: 15.9375 23.2022227129 69% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8558975462 57.7814097925 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.625 141.986410481 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9375 23.2022227129 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.724660767414 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.58251231527 28% => OK
Readability: 40.6433823529 51.9672348444 78% => OK
Elegance: 1.46153846154 1.8405768891 79% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34841910579 0.441005458295 79% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.153654459093 0.135418324435 113% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0685334015589 0.0829849096947 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.608549167765 0.58762219726 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.105589374737 0.147661913831 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148150533632 0.193483328276 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105520588662 0.0970749176394 109% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.350190953333 0.42659136922 82% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0669843969511 0.0774707102158 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238268586732 0.312017818177 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650074390877 0.0698173142475 93% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.33743842365 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.87684729064 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.82512315271 83% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 6.46551724138 31% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 5.36822660099 93% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.82389162562 35% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 14.657635468 55% => OK
---------------------
More content wanted. For issue essays, around 450 words, for argument essays, around 400 words.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.