Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They believe it has many health-promoting nutrients, such as cartilage, which can heal our joints, and chondroitin, which promotes nerve regeneration. Skeptics point out that ingested cartilage can’t replenish cartilage in your knees or elbows and ingested chondroitin doesn’t make our brains any healthier. Yet, there is strong anecdotal evidence that people who consume bone broth have fewer metabolic and inflammatory diseases than those who don’t. Therefore, ancient humans knew something about our physiology that we don’t, and that by emulating the way they ate, we can cure many chronic illnesses.
The given arguments seems to be somewhat vague with respect to the topic that it tries to argue. It presents some claims and evidences which are completely skeptical irrespective of any graphs or reports for the same. At the end, it tries to instill the conditions which worked for our ancestors, prove to be true even now.
The first line stated that Paleo diets are becoming increasingly popular but fails to provide any references for the same. It also does not provide any evidence about the people who consume such diets. Next, it claims that our bodies are evolved to eat such diets, this just reflects an exaggerated statement without any reports supporting it. Does it point out to the people who consume animals or does it speak about vegans? Hence, the given idea must be added with examples and reports in order to support the given statements.
Proponents believe that such a diet has health-promoting nutrients, irrespective of the actual contents of vitamins or minerals being depicted. It might be that, there might be constituents which might have some side effects, but such a fact is completely denied by the given argument. Hence, it fails to provide any numbers or percentages of the actual composition of minerals in such diets.
In the fourth line, the argument poses a contradiction to the idea specified just before it. But even the given information is insufficient to provide any counter-fact for the given argument. It fails to provide any actual example or reports for the claim that it makes.
Although Paleo diets might have some health benefits as stated in the given argument, author must try to elaborate more on the constituents and try to provide more examples on how following such a diet has been proven advantageous for people along with their reviews.
In the second last statement, author states that there's some anecdotal evidence for prevention of such diseases, but fails to give out the same in the given argument. There might be some cases which are completely opposite to the one stated. There might be chances that the given diseases are avoided but some others might have developed due to such diets. Hence, the given evidence is incomprehensible.
At last, author says that we must follow the same diet as our ancestors followed it. But the conditions then and now, are completely different. There might be chances that our ancestors worked in the field for the whole day and hence, were able to digest such heavy diets. Today, following such diets might lead to some worse consequences.
Hence, the given argument fails to provide any reports or numbers for people today, to rely on such diets. According to me, the given argument fails to provide any comprehensive view and hence, might be difficult for anyone to completely digest the given facts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jason123 | 69 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Chayank_11 | 57 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | hyunjulia99 | 75 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | neha1980 | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | noitsimani | 61 | view |
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 63
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying. 50
- Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won’t benefit their future careers. 58
- Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals.Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which 58
- It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts. 73
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 25 15
No. of Words: 472 350
No. of Characters: 2275 1500
No. of Different Words: 195 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.661 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.82 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.591 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 138 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 106 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 74 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 47 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.88 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.339 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.56 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.334 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.598 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.085 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 8 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 21, column 50, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...cond last statement, author states that theres some anecdotal evidence for prevention ...
^^^^^^
Line 29, column 108, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...or people today, to rely on such diets. According to me, the given argument fails to provide an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, second, so, still, then, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.6327345309 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 11.1786427146 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 13.6137724551 118% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 28.8173652695 111% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 55.5748502994 97% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2363.0 2260.96107784 105% => OK
No of words: 472.0 441.139720559 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0063559322 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.56307096286 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64566224062 2.78398813304 95% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 204.123752495 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.425847457627 0.468620217663 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 731.7 705.55239521 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 19.7664670659 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.6408249235 57.8364921388 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.52 119.503703932 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.88 23.324526521 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.76 5.70786347227 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 8.0 5.15768463074 155% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 6.88822355289 203% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10680537001 0.218282227539 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0375243172762 0.0743258471296 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381819338067 0.0701772020484 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0577822722503 0.128457276422 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315623666301 0.0628817314937 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.3799401198 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.3550499002 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.5979740519 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.32208582834 91% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 98.500998004 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.