All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for company to operate more efficiently. If companies would spend more time listening to their employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
The purpose of hiring a person for the job entails checking whether the skills of the candidate are in consonance with the requirement of the job, this is achieved through various ways of interviewing the candidate like telephonic, direct personal interviews etc. Consultancy is a role in which a person or a group of skilled professionals are hired chiefly to advise the company on various decisions and issues like internal matters and more importantly matters such as decisions regarding the future trajectory of the company, they thus hold a very important role and it wouldn't be an understatement to say that, a leading role in giving a direction to the company. That stated, nowadays a growing trend is being noticed in the industries to hire professionals outside their organisation and sometimes even consultants who have no prior experience of the concerned industry itself. This trend can undermine the long term interests of the company and also any industry as a whole.
My contention is that a person who has worked in the company is better equipped and is more aware of the internal dynamics of the company and how these internal dynamics of the company interplay with the overall market-dynamics which finally bring-about the overall picture of the industry in comparison to somebody or a group of consultants to whom the task of consultancy has been outsourced. This is buttressed even further by the fact that the outside consultants sometimes do not even have any relevant experience in the domain and are principally analyzing the company based on the superficial sales figures and the overall market conditions-data. Many a times it happens that as a result these outside consultants end up making suggestions which might look pretty on paper and worthy of bringing about the intended action, but when these suggestions are put into practice, there is a deep chasm between the actual implementation and intended output as a result of poor factoring in the human aspect of any organisation which is the employee force of the organisation which more often that not is not properly factored in by the outside consultants owing to their dissociation with the internal dynamics of the company. Here I believe existing employees of the company would be able to guide the company better in comparison to some armchair consultants sitting outside the organisation as they have a first hand idea and experience of working in the company.
Another essential thing which we must not overlook her is the fact that an employee of the company have seen different times in the company and the industry and thus have a first-hand experience of steering the company through different times thus prove to be better in the longer run. Whereas the idea of hiring outside consultants along with their argument of bringing in diversity to the company only looks good on paper not on the ground.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-09-20 | SushantGRE | 16 | view |
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 65
- Best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 50
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 50
- In a nation there should be a common curriculum upto college. 50
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for company to operate more efficiently. If companies would spend more time listening to their employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 574, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... thus hold a very important role and it wouldnt be an understatement to say that, a lea...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 983, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mpany and also any industry as a whole. My contention is that a person who has ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 661, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a time' or simply 'times'?
Suggestion: a time; times
...he overall market conditions-data. Many a times it happens that as a result these outsi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1468, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d experience of working in the company. Another essential thing which we must ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s prove to be better in the longer run. Whereas the idea of hiring outside consultants ...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'if', 'look', 'regarding', 'so', 'thus', 'whereas', 'such as', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.243460764588 0.240241500013 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.144869215292 0.157235817809 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0804828973843 0.0880659088768 91% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0623742454728 0.0497285424764 125% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0241448692153 0.0444667217837 54% => OK
Prepositions: 0.150905432596 0.12292977631 123% => OK
Participles: 0.0583501006036 0.0406280797675 144% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.94135311714 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0221327967807 0.030933414821 72% => OK
Particles: 0.00201207243461 0.0016655270985 121% => OK
Determiners: 0.164989939638 0.0997080785238 165% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00804828973843 0.0249443105267 32% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0221327967807 0.0148568991511 149% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2903.0 2732.02544248 106% => OK
No of words: 480.0 452.878318584 106% => OK
Chars per words: 6.04791666667 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.58838876751 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.36875 0.366273622748 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.3125 0.280924506359 111% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.20625 0.200843997647 103% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.133333333333 0.132149295362 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94135311714 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 219.290929204 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458333333333 0.48968727796 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 51.8819528513 55.4138127331 94% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6194690265 48% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 48.0 23.380412469 205% => Sentence lengths are too long.
Sentence length SD: 129.506331892 59.4972553346 218% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 290.3 141.124799967 206% => Less chars per sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 48.0 23.380412469 205% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.2 0.674092028746 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.94800884956 61% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 79.25 51.4728631049 154% => OK
Elegance: 1.95652173913 1.64882698954 119% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122590301727 0.391690518653 31% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.215667402227 0.123202303941 175% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0689061881755 0.077325440228 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.724857974718 0.547984918172 132% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.10613154237 0.149214159877 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853603570015 0.161403998019 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052756158722 0.0892212321368 59% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.71211227089 0.385218514788 185% => Paragraphs have same ideas.
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.00690871042732 0.0692045440612 10% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105668951734 0.275328986314 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00984934559965 0.0653680567796 15% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.4325221239 58% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 13.5995575221 74% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.