Term limits are not ubiquitously applicable for all forms of enterprise. In government, the designation of regular term limits, four years in the United States presidency, for example, ensures a balance of power and of policies ideas—a critical component to maintain civil liberties and preclude political stagnation. It is believed that, in business, CEOs and industry leaders would stagnate the innovative capacities of a company if they were to remain too long. However, let us take Apple as an example. Apple was led by the same man, Steve Jobs, for most of its existence and generated the most profitable technology experience company on the planet. It can be argued that Apple’s success and undeniable influence was contingent on Job’s lifelong leadership. When Steve Jobs passed away, the new leader Steve Cook, found his vision of Apple to be incompatible with the existing operational structure and demands of consumers and Apple entered precarious territory, shortly after. In other words, term limits are imperatives for all successful enterprises. Government and business, among other enterprises are fundamentally different in their goals and operations and, as a result, the implementation of universal term limits for leadership is inconducive and flawed.
Advances in technology and communications have made significant paradigm shifts in business, government, politics, education, and government. This system of innovation and its influence on social domains is incompatible with a universal five-year term limit for leadership. Computer power increases at very predictable rates over time and changes the technological landscape regularly. Innovation, by extension, is also rapidly growing. Beyond the material and environmental implications of these paradigm shifts, there are also social impacts as well. Machine learning, decision trees, and other forms of artificial intelligence have usurped human roles with greater efficiency and accuracy. Leadership roles are not immune to these changes. For example, in medicine IBM’s Watson, an artificial intelligence system, is rapidly encroaching on the role of physicians in diagnostics and treatment. In banking, algorithms have all but replaced the loan officer. In the near future, traditionally human roles, will become the domain of computers. Therefore, the pervasiveness of these changes is quite apparent in a myriad of fields. As a result, the traditional systems of leadership become increasingly volatile and contested. Therefore, the appropriate limit of a term limit is not fixed over time.
Term limits for leaders effective ways to ensure innovative ideas from a variety of perspectives, but do not account for the limitations of compatibility and implementation of policies and procedures beyond term limits, where the technology and by extension, the social hierarchy is obscured. There is no logical reason to assert that five years is the appropriate term limit for leaders for all forms of enterprises. Rather, leadership roles and paths to success are highly particular and should be tailored to fit their respective fields of enterprise.
- The following is part of a memorandum from the president of Humana University."Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offeredby nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent. During the same year, Omnishowed a signif 55
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 79
- The following appeared in the summary of a study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia."Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin, a medicine used to treat headaches. Although many foods are naturally rich in salicylates, f 49
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than i 29
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries. 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, well, for example, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2688.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 471.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70700636943 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20440620551 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549893842887 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 864.0 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 62.1243140807 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.52 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.84 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10382403121 0.243740707755 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0267120893889 0.0831039109588 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0262092621334 0.0758088955206 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0768375625534 0.150359130593 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251610296004 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 48.8420337079 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.1639044944 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.38706741573 118% => OK
difficult_words: 161.0 100.480337079 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.