The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Not only a leader needs to lead the team or organization or a society, but also needs to gain the best benefits possible for the team. This cannot be achived just by cooperation, but also needs healthy compitetion to achieve this. I explain this in my next paragraphs with examples.
Firstly, Competition is needed to climb the hierarchy ladder provided by the society. Leaders evolve when then they climb these social or corporate ladders. We see politicions, busineess tycoons and CEOs in our daily lifes, but only few of they decorate the highest positon in the field, these people evolved into these positions and known to most people because they competed their contemporaries or the people who are also looking for the same positons. To illustrate, President Trump has competed with Hillary Clinton to win the USA elections 2016. Similarly, Virat Kohli, Caption of Indian cricket tem, has competed with his team mates -- Rohit Sharma, Dhawan - and become the caption of the team. One must compete to get achive these positions.
Building from the above paragraph, those all people who climbs this ladder won't become leaders. Those with the capability to lead their team with the people under them becomes the leaders. This can be achieved with bi-directional cooperation between the leader and his/her team, and team with their leader. To examplify, a CEO must compete with the board of directors and the vice presidents of the organization to become a CEO. However, unless there is a cooperation between the CEO and the directors, he can not achive the strategic goals. Also, as the directors also the potential leaders of their domains, they need to cooperate with CEO, and the CEO also need to cooperate the directors and allow them to get their teams stratagic gaols are fulfilled.
But only with competiton, people can climb the ladders of the government or industry but they connot stay there for long. As I mentioned in the above paragraph, the CEO alone cannot lead and achieve the strategic goals, he also needs the people working with him needs to be cooperating him and he also needs to cooperate them to get mutual benifits for their team and there by to their organization and become a leader.
To conclude, it is not just the cooperation allows people to become leaders, but the competitive cooperation allows people to become leaders. So, society needs to install both cooperation and healty competition in the young people to become leaders.
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 54
- Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725−1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, including kings and writers, his memoir has 65
- "SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville. The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville proves that Corporateville is a superior place to live than Middlesburg, the home of SuperCorp's original headquarters. 55
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 75
- Of the two leading real estate firms in our town, Adams Realty and Fitch Realty, Adams is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents. In contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work only part-time. Moreover, Adams' revenue last year was twice as 63
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, similarly, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2070.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 412.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02427184466 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64054630183 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466019417476 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 638.1 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.3184250566 60.3974514979 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.947368421 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6842105263 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42105263158 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.83258426966 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0995528726066 0.243740707755 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.034465208655 0.0831039109588 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400125026264 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0692801301226 0.150359130593 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234200951484 0.0667264976115 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, similarly, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2070.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 412.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02427184466 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64054630183 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466019417476 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 638.1 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.3184250566 60.3974514979 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.947368421 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6842105263 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42105263158 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.83258426966 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0995528726066 0.243740707755 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.034465208655 0.0831039109588 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400125026264 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0692801301226 0.150359130593 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234200951484 0.0667264976115 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.