the best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
The topic raises a thought provoking issue on whether the best way to teach is by praising positive actions and ignoring negative ones. Indisputably, mere criticism will not have a positive impact on the person. Nevertheless, not impugning an individual’s actions when necessary will have a minatory effect in the long run. Thus I generally disagree with the opinion that ignoring negative actions is the best way to teach.
Firstly, it is critical to understand that we as human beings are quixotic and learn by making mistakes constantly. We need to be reminded from a young age that learning from constructive criticism molds us into better individuals. By ignoring the negative actions, it is known to build a misconception in one’s own head that they can do no wrong leading them to become overconfident and headstrong people. It is from personal experience I speak, that I have truly evolved into a person who is able to gauge the difference between what is right and what is wrong and make conscious decisions due to the criticisms I received as a child from both my parents and teachers. Also, it is true that lauding a person for actions which are good is crucial as it is known to boost confidence and perform better in everyday life activities.
Furthermore, there is also a polarizing view that extreme criticism without praising good actions can lead to serious issues as an adult. The person might not have any self confidence, develop anxiety, slip into depression and feel onerous to their loved ones cause they manifest the idea that they are worthless.
There is evidence to prove that individuals who have never been taught to accept criticisms from people have difficulty in the long run as specially in the work place environment there is always somebody to tell you what to do and how you can improve. In order to thrive in a peaceful environment there is a need to take every lambaste in a positive sense.
In conclusion, although praising positive actions is an important aspect of teaching, making sure there is a balance of both approbation and condemning when needed is essential.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-02 | MMoksha | 66 | view |
| 2024-06-30 | sefeliz | 66 | view |
| 2024-06-30 | AkellaSrinivas | 66 | view |
| 2024-04-17 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Zahid6400 | 66 | view |
- the best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 50
- the best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 50
- When XYZ lays off employees it pays Delany Personnel Firm to offer those employees assistance in creating r sum s and developing interviewing skills if they so desire Laid off employees have benefited greatly from Delany s services last year those who use 68
- the best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 62
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 325, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...have a minatory effect in the long run. Thus I generally disagree with the opinion t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, thus, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 358.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94413407821 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84002258541 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553072625698 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2067588157 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.428571429 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305246099585 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113053990243 0.0831039109588 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.160687429039 0.0758088955206 212% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16321417667 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.171573136437 0.0667264976115 257% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 325, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...have a minatory effect in the long run. Thus I generally disagree with the opinion t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, thus, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 358.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94413407821 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84002258541 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553072625698 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2067588157 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.428571429 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305246099585 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113053990243 0.0831039109588 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.160687429039 0.0758088955206 212% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16321417667 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.171573136437 0.0667264976115 257% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.