The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
This is a moot issue. We have to take dialectics and multiple perspectives to examine the pros and cons.
Like every coin has two sides, this statement as well has two perspectives. Consider our works always receive praises and our negative works are overlooked: Albeit it is true that when our actions are appreciated, we feel more motivated and enthusiastic about that work and therefore showcase more alacrity in doing that work. But if our actions continue to be applauded every time, at one point we would reach a stage where we would take ‘appreciations’ for granted and stop putting effort on it. In other words, when appreciation is all we receive we tend to get laid back, consider ourselves flawless and show no inclination towards learning or improving our actions.
Now ponder on the case where our negative actions alone are being highlighted and our positive actions are being ignored. Here we tend to grow depressed and demotivated as irrespective of what we do, only the bad part captures the attention. Thereby we give up, lose self-confidence and convince ourselves that we are losers.
A wise man said, ‘Anything in excess is a poison’. So is it with teaching practices where you either are appreciated or criticized.
The best teaching practice would be when there is a balance between both applause and criticism. A person’s positive actions should be praised as this would boost their self-confidence and keep them pumped up to deliver their best under every circumstance. Equally the negative action of a person has to be pin-pointed so that they can learn from them and work towards rectifying them. This would help them ‘grow’ as a person and aid in accelerating their quality of work
The statement makes a sweeping generalization. Though true at times but not always. In a long run a balance in appreciation and criticism is all one needs to learn and flourish in life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-13 | sepnkycehmqcodjefl | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-02 | MMoksha | 66 | view |
| 2024-06-30 | sefeliz | 66 | view |
| 2024-06-30 | AkellaSrinivas | 66 | view |
| 2024-04-17 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo written by the head of the Gorham School."Our school cafeteria should make changes in the lunches that it serves in order to improve the health of our students. Several teachers and I have observed that students who eat th 70
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 58
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student’s field of study 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...apos;appreciations' for granted and stop putting effort on it. In other word...
^^
Line 8, column 263, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...er their best under every circumstance. Equally the negative action of a person has to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 77, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...alization. Though true at times but not always. In a long run a balance in appreciatio...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'as to', 'in other words', 'it is true']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.20054200542 0.240241500013 83% => OK
Verbs: 0.211382113821 0.157235817809 134% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0542005420054 0.0880659088768 62% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0406504065041 0.0497285424764 82% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0813008130081 0.0444667217837 183% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.0840108401084 0.12292977631 68% => OK
Participles: 0.0514905149051 0.0406280797675 127% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.21454874414 2.79330140395 115% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0216802168022 0.030933414821 70% => OK
Particles: 0.00271002710027 0.0016655270985 163% => OK
Determiners: 0.0813008130081 0.0997080785238 82% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0189701897019 0.0249443105267 76% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0189701897019 0.0148568991511 128% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1941.0 2732.02544248 71% => OK
No of words: 321.0 452.878318584 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.04672897196 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.58838876751 92% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.311526479751 0.366273622748 85% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.264797507788 0.280924506359 94% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.193146417445 0.200843997647 96% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.121495327103 0.132149295362 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21454874414 2.79330140395 115% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 219.290929204 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573208722741 0.48968727796 117% => OK
Word variations: 62.6962806111 55.4138127331 113% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6194690265 82% => OK
Sentence length: 18.8823529412 23.380412469 81% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.668196458 59.4972553346 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.176470588 141.124799967 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8823529412 23.380412469 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.588235294118 0.674092028746 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 45.36210372 51.4728631049 88% => OK
Elegance: 1.0081300813 1.64882698954 61% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295998072878 0.391690518653 76% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0755138515181 0.123202303941 61% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0641074185361 0.077325440228 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.526567017789 0.547984918172 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.159785407058 0.149214159877 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103808522423 0.161403998019 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701908424672 0.0892212321368 79% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.170647715624 0.385218514788 44% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.09986852418 0.0692045440612 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174645869038 0.275328986314 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697775573927 0.0653680567796 107% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.5995575221 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.