The best way to teach — whether as an educator, employer, or parent — is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Let's start our approach towards the given prompt with a best suited example - a student is trying to learn a new foreign language. The educator tends to avoid constantly pin pointing the student for the flaws in his accent and, continues to praise him for his effort. What according to you, could be the final performance at the end of the language classes? Would the student might come out of he institute with not so proper knowledge? or maybe the student motivated by the educator, would take extra efforts and try on fixing the loopholes in his knowledge on his own.
The given prompt states that the most pertinent way to teach anyone is to keep them highly motivated with constant praises, while tending to overlook any negative points in their work. We have observed in the example above that agreement to this statement could be relative. Lets get back to our example and understand the dynamics of the situation - could continuous praises lead to incomplete development? Human in times seems to focus more on their strengths rather than their weaknesses. For an overall development it is important to know where one is lacking. Though constant criticism could be discouraging, positive and constructive approach towards healthy suggestions is a must for growth and development. So, as an educator, employer or a parent it is important to bring to notice the points for improvements when needed. "All sunshine makes deserts", similarly all sweet words might destroy the chances of betterment in personality or work.
Now, we would be considering the second situation - could constant praising keep the student motivated enough to perform without the pressure? The answer to this question changes with each person. While each person and personality are different a single word can have different impacts. Human nature and brain works in mysterious ways. Constant criticism might discourage someone's chances of trying. Well said that a pen is mightier than a sword, words could be even more lethal. So, it is important to know how the person is grasping comments about their negative actions or shortcomings.
To sum it up, agreement or disagreement towards the prompt is a very person 'person' specific answer. It changes with the person, relationship with the person addressing, the situation, the time, the words and what not. While teaching someone should not always be sweet words of praises it is also important to bring to a notice about their negative actions in constructive way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-08-26 | aaa111 | 33 | view |
| 2024-07-13 | sepnkycehmqcodjefl | 50 | view |
| 2024-04-17 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-28 | mei_unavailable | 83 | view |
- The vice president of human resources at Climpson Industries sent the following recommendation to the company s president In an effort to improve our employees productivity we should implement electronic monitoring of employees Internet use from their wor 62
- Davis Technologies a computer chip maker could solve its problem of declining sales by dropping its prices This would make Davis better able to compete in the highly competitive computer chip market The sales of chips would increase and this would substan 67
- Teachers salaries should be based on their students academic performance Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compelling reaso 92
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of a large group of hospitals In a laboratory study of liquid antibacterial hand soaps a concentrated solution of UltraClean produced a 40 percent greater reduction in the bacteria population than did the 57
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
Lets start our approach towards the given pr...
^^^^
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... approach towards the given prompt with a best suited example - a student is tryi...
^
Line 1, column 392, Rule ID: HE_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'of the institute'?
Suggestion: of the institute
...asses? Would the student might come out of he institute with not so proper knowledge? or maybe ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 438, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Or
...institute with not so proper knowledge? or maybe the student motivated by the educ...
^^
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...nt to this statement could be relative. Lets get back to our example and understand ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 70, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: person
...sagreement towards the prompt is a very person person specific answer. It changes with the pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 219, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tion, the time, the words and what not. While teaching someone should not always be s...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, may, second, similarly, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2099.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 410.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11951219512 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77520502358 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539024390244 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6679087073 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.2608695652 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8260869565 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.39130434783 5.21951772744 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118235630215 0.243740707755 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0328629202776 0.0831039109588 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335220737933 0.0758088955206 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0727582159059 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251999261419 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.