Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.
Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The speaker asserts that people should not believe any information that regarded as a fact because a great number of them have proven to be inaccurate. While for both the claim and the reason, the circumstance where they are agreeable should be consider differently for different fields.
In the field of science, it is unjustifiable to blindly think that any fact is untrustworthy especially in nowadays. In the past, it might be true that people should not easily trust information that referred to as a fact since a lot of them was constructed based on religion beliefs. For example, there was a time where the majority of the people thought that the earth was the centre of the universe. but eventually, a scientist pointed out heliocentric theory and proves that the it is actually the sun the centre of the universe. Nevertheless, in recent society, technologies have become so much advanced and researchers can fly to any place around the world or even into space to conduct a comprehensive investigation or experiment before coming to a conclusion. In other words, what have been established as facts have extensive amount of evidences as their base to support them and they are highly credible.
However, information regarding to celebrities should not be trusted easily. micheal jackson, one of the most talented musician in the world, was being assault because the change of his skin colour. At that time, a gigantic amount of entertainment news reported that he intentionally made the change to white skin because of his discriminations towards black. Nonetheless, some discovered that the truth was the skin disease that caused the skin colour change, but micheal jackson still suffered a lot because there was a lot of people who believed the fake news. recently, due to businesses’ ambition in catching public attention, a lot of them tend to create informations that are explosive but inaccurate. Therefore, informations related to the entertainment industry that people assume as factual might turns out to be false.
In sum, the speaker overgeneralize the situations in different fields. The most important thing is, no matter for what kinds of information, people should hold a rational and clinical attitude toward them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | gauravwazza12 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Kutumba kasyap | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | macropinna | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | Roshan Dhakal | 83 | view |
| 2019-11-08 | AAAA2222 | 83 | view |
- Title: Super Screen MoviesThe following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Scr 34
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette. "The population on Balmer Island increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents involving mopeds and pedestrians, the town council of Bal 55
- The following opinion was provided in a letter to the editor of a national aeronautics magazine:“Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great 55
- Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns 75
- The following appeared in a memo to the board of the Grandview Symphony."The city of Grandview has provided annual funding for the Grandview Symphony since the symphony's inception-pocetak ten years ago. Last year the symphony hired an internati 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 246, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'considered'?
Suggestion: considered
...ance where they are agreeable should be consider differently for different fields. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 105, Rule ID: IN_NOWADAYS[1]
Message: nowadays is used without 'in'. Use simply: 'nowadays'.
Suggestion: nowadays
...at any fact is untrustworthy especially in nowadays. In the past, it might be true that peo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 404, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...e earth was the centre of the universe. but eventually, a scientist pointed out hel...
^^^
Line 11, column 480, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
...out heliocentric theory and proves that the it is actually the sun the centre of the u...
^^^^^^
Line 21, column 77, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Micheal
...lebrities should not be trusted easily. micheal jackson, one of the most talented music...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 564, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Recently
...t of people who believed the fake news. recently, due to businesses' ambition in ca...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, regarding, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1968.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 365.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39178082192 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05174735915 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550684931507 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6283023072 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8125 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.21951772744 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282385590887 0.243740707755 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935611918623 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0976852454251 0.0758088955206 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162017658207 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0859377708836 0.0667264976115 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.