Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
In order for a company to thrive, its employees must be efficient and dedicated. So the intention of the policy seems to be at the right place but I am not convinced that the policy can be efficacious as though the policy might force the employees to be more prompt, concise and careful with what they email, this enforcement has an adverse cost to it. How far can the company actually go in monitoring the employees before driving them to solecism? Such restrictions tend to bridle the employees which might lower their productivity and efficiency. A lot of the people like to work with a certain sense of freedom where they at least have the assurance that they are not being constantly monitored. This policy might also make the employees more aversive to the company and thus, tend to affect their dedication negatively. Hence this policy can be self-destructive in the sense that it mars the very purpose of its conception - betterment of the company.
Moreover, how does the company even go on to implement such a policy? Monitoring something as subjective as an email is quite the task in itself. For example, in a lot of cases, there might be a need to establish a personal connection with the client in order to get a deal later. In these cases, the employee will need to establish cordial relations with the client by means of trivial and quotidian conversation. Now these conversations can be seen as frivolous and waste of company's resources and, the employee might find himself in trouble for that. In this manner, a case can be made for a lot of other types of cases where there might be an exception from the side of client or rapprochement of some kind is required or there is an emergency of some kind which will involve some non-work conversations to begin. It will becomes quite difficult to keep track of every such case for each of the employee, especially in a large enough company.
Regular monitoring might have the advantage of keeping the activities in check, especially considering legal matters. But restraining the employees at the cost of implementing a tedious policy which will only reduce the employees performance seems to be a too great cost for keeping a regular check on the legal activities. There can be other measures such as making the employees aware about the rules and consequences of a breach of company policies. Employees can be made to report their monthly or quarterly progress to their supervisor which will prevent the employees from straying from their job too much.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | himanshu mardikar | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | Chayank_11 | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | chapagain08 | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | Walia Farzana | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | anusingh | 75 | view |
- The best way for society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields in by instilling them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 58
- Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits. 50
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States, despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal re 59
- Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military. 50
- Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 827, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... to affect their dedication negatively. Hence this policy can be self-destructive in ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 827, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'become'
Suggestion: become
...on-work conversations to begin. It will becomes quite difficult to keep track of every ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 221, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...dious policy which will only reduce the employees performance seems to be a too great cos...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, at least, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2094.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 434.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82488479263 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79783053942 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481566820276 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1052024162 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.333333333 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177876034311 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700520828232 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472770317822 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135821845879 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244045139727 0.0667264976115 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.