The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.
How well a country is doing can majorly be judged by how well the citizens of that country are doing. A country is made by people so people’s wellness should be measured to know how the country is performing. I agree that well being of citizen can be the best instrument that can help decide the effectiveness and efficiency of the country’s leader.
Country’s leader effectiveness can be judged by how the citizens of that country are performing. For example a country may have higher GDP or higher economic growth but that not necessary means that the citizens of that country are doing well. GDP is a combination of all households present in the country, which may include people who are extremely rich and people who are extremely poor, because of which correct GDP is not acquired. So, whether the country’s leader is doing well or not can best be measured by how much of the citizens are performing well out of the total country’s population. A country’s leader should be one who is bias free and not only supports the wealthy group of people.
A country’s leader might favour the rich part of the society as they will be the ones who will support him or will help him in future. So, when well being of all of the country’s citizen is measured it will reflect that the leader has been performing effectively and efficiently or not. Economic growth cannot only determine how well the country is doing. A leader might improve the conditions of the rich people by making them more rich and because of this the overall economic growth of the country will increase, but actually the poor population are still in the same position and hence the figures of economic growth might have gone up (by making rich people more rich), but it has not actually improved the state of the company as majority of the population are still suffering.
So, whether a leader is doing well for the country or not should be judged by how the citizens of that country are performing and how much are still below poverty line and how much citizens are now in well being position. But this does not mean that only well being of citizens should be considered to measure the leaders performance but also various other factors that are not shown by citizen for example development of infrastructure for the betterment of people but because they are not educated they are not able to use those infrastructure properly.
Hence how a country’s leader is performing can be best measured by looking at the well being of citizen but that should not be the only point in discussing his performance abilities, but various other factors should be taken into account to see the overall effectiveness of the country’s leader.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | sapana | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | shuocurity | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | priyanayak | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | yesh | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-23 | anvay | 50 | view |
- A recently issued twenty-year study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia investigated the possible therapeutic effect of consuming salicylates. Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin, a medicine used to treat headaches. 59
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. 66
- The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...s who will support him or will help him in future. So, when well being of all of the coun...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...p him in future. So, when well being of all of the country's citizen is measured it w...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the population are still suffering. So, whether a leader is doing well for t...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 177, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...ch are still below poverty line and how much citizens are now in well being position...
^^^^
Line 9, column 315, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...ens should be considered to measure the leaders performance but also various other fact...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 526, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this infrastructure' or 'those infrastructures'?
Suggestion: this infrastructure; those infrastructures
...e not educated they are not able to use those infrastructure properly. Hence how a country&a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o use those infrastructure properly. Hence how a country's leader is per...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... those infrastructure properly. Hence how a country's leader is performi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, hence, look, may, so, still, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 43.0 19.5258426966 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2290.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 471.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86199575372 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84736886132 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.348195329087 0.4932671777 71% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 697.5 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.9434199245 60.3974514979 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.666666667 118.986275619 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4 23.4991977007 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46666666667 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375254874075 0.243740707755 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.200515737473 0.0831039109588 241% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10163709406 0.0758088955206 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284439585383 0.150359130593 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747746943296 0.0667264976115 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.