Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The author claims that each individual in a society is responsible for obeying just law and disobeying and resisting unjust ones. However, I personally do not agree with this statement.
It is clear that author agrees to the opinion that there should be no exception that every single person is obligated to follow what the fair laws claim and not follow those laws that are believed to be unfair. It is true that when laws are constituted, there could be some misunderstanding and overlooking leading to the result that some laws could seem unreasonable or even unfair. Disagreeing with these laws by taking actions of disobeying and resistance could improve the law system by promoting the law makers scrutinize the current laws revise and complete those laws that may have flaws under certain conditions. However, to my personal view, even if there are circumstances that some law could be regarded as unfair, it is not a wise suggestion that citizens should disobey those laws.
It must be stated that a standard is required for the successful development of any society, and that is why laws are created and it must be obeyed strictly by every single individual. People should be aware that it is a very complex and thorough progress to establish a law. The progress has to go through a great many of procedure starting from proposing, through many levels of investigations and examination, finally to the establishment. In addition, all these steps are carries out under a team of people with the most professional knowledge and completed experience. Even though it cannot be guaranteed that all established laws are perfect that is reasonable and fair under all cases and conditions, it is still of tremendous help to have such a thorough and established system to standard human’s behaviors.
When the author makes the above statement, I strongly question that what are the standards to determine if a law is just or unjust. And the answer is clearly that there are no standards on this. And simply suggest individuals to not to follow the laws that they regarded as unjust could easily cause a huge turbulence in the society. Furthermore, it is a hard problem to tell if a law is fair not only for individuals but also for countries. That is why there are still many conflicts existing among different countries' laws. For instance, death sentence is executed in some countries while are forbidden in others. This type of discrepancy is created due to a combination of various factors such as culture, religion, its country's own consideration, etc. Therefore, in countries that has death sentence, transgressors that disobey certain laws must be punished by death sentence and there should be no exceptions since the exception will definitely trigger the dissatisfaction and angers among public. Likely, criminals cannot be executed with death sentence in those countries that forbid this laws no matter how severe the criminal is.
It can be concluded from the following discussions that encouraging individuals to obey only the laws that they believe are fair and disobey the ones they regard as unfair is not helpful to promote the society's happy and stability, and it can even cause the turbulence that impede the society's development and individual's life. Therefore, it should be reached to concord that the established laws must be followed since it is under the work of a group of people after deep studying and consideration.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Abhipray Singh | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | Jolly1111111 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | chapagain08 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | Bonjourkmm | 58 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1092, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...sentence in those countries that forbid this laws no matter how severe the criminal ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, still, therefore, while, as to, for instance, in addition, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 45.0 19.5258426966 230% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 28.0 11.3162921348 247% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 56.0 33.0505617978 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2889.0 2235.4752809 129% => OK
No of words: 572.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0506993007 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89045207381 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9127128097 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.452797202797 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 899.1 704.065955056 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.8212110051 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.318181818 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.31818181818 5.21951772744 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238872013022 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738423744244 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738002565267 0.0758088955206 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167165983682 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0828831897292 0.0667264976115 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 100.480337079 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.