A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
The statement posits that there should exist one national schooling curriculum across the nation. Surely one well-designed syllabus would keep students abreast of various subjects - hence they would be able to get a flavor of every scientific field and choose one area of studies that suit them most. In my humble opinion, the same national curriculum, deliberately premeditated and motley, could help to develop analytical skills and inchoate ability to see from different perspectives.
In support of the statement, one schooling syllabus might abate any inequality amid poor and reach kids, thus it would be easier to maintain unequivocal human right to achieve higher degree ensuring social mobility. Likewise, parents usually stick to school within their neighborhood paying little attention to the quality of education. Generally speaking, rural areas, compared to capitals, commonly have worse level of education shaping the pupils’ knowledge from the beginning. As a corroborating evidence, I personally suffered from that educational inequality within my home-country. With taciturn obedience, I had to attend school mainly focused on humanities with little or no attention to STEM subjects. To that end, one general curriculum is underscored by the importance of maintaining equal rights within a country’s borders.
In contrary to the statement, one might espouse the contrarian viewpoint that general curriculum won’t help to ease this conundrum. According to their viewpoint, knowledge about the subject is directly related to aspects of teaching rather than to the syllabus itself. Likewise, the equality is hardly reachable as rich people will always have an access to get private tutors and personalised learning strategies in public schools.
Undoubtedly, I should admit that the prior viewpoint is hard to disagree. I would like to emphasize this last example providing the most hope in how one curriculum actually opens up new opportunities for teenagers. By maintaining of standard of educational qualifications and increasing the overall level of knowledge, new generations will be more likely to face entry requirements in colleges. Therefore, in the long run, countries that haven’t adopted this strategy on time will cede ground to the nations with high quality of compulsory education.
One national curriculum will let students to get a taste of every subject and choose the prospect of their future studies more reasonably. Alongside, it can help to tackle inequality in education, elusive yet attainable goal. We should be aware that we have made first steps towards equal rights.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | AlmeeC. | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lekuleku | 62 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | nikhil40507 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | greuela001 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | vineel | 58 | view |
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.Write a response in which you 66
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 88
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be su 80
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 350, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
...achable as rich people will always have an access to get private tutors and personalised ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, hence, if, likewise, so, therefore, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2252.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 399.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64411027569 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04730926392 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614035087719 0.4932671777 124% => OK
syllable_count: 711.9 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7522103429 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.526315789 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.31578947368 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166967510125 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497697634476 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723430096507 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100336957887 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0866293596734 0.0667264976115 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 48.8420337079 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.1639044944 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.38706741573 119% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.