A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
A uniform curriculum for all the students of a nation prior to college may not be beneficial in all circumstances. A major factor that determines its efficacy is the flexibility that the curriculum offers.
The following paragraphs describe how a uniform curriculum might benefit the nation and its populace.
It can be assumed that students graduating a certain class meet a standard bar in terms of knowledge in different subjects as opposed to different curriculae prescribing their own textbooks and examination patterns, thus setting different standards for students of a given level.
It would be easier to manage admissions to colleges of higher education as students can report scores that are uniform. This would not be possible if students had studied different subject material, which would then warrant a standardized test for admissions to colleges.
From an administration perspective, it might be easier for the government or the governing body to roll out scholarships, conduct examinations, abolish corruption, and provide free education to students enrolled in the public or private schools that deliver the national curriculum. This could also translate to potential savings for the exchequer which could be useful be used for other purposes of national interest.
On a side note, having schools that teach the same subject matter means that the teachers could move between different parts of the country with minimal friction by not having to face tedious interviews.
However, it is not all whistles and bells for a single national curriculum. The following are the various shortcomings of this policy.
If the policy does not account for flexibility, it may not allow students to pursue subjects of their interest. Assuming that flexible course options are a rarity until college, the national committee deciding on the curriculum should be wary of the flexible course options. One such option would be inclusion of endemic languages in the curriculum.
The national curriculum could be easier to certain students with greater mettle than the national average and may be tougher to students from certain geographies with limited economic activity. The curriculum should be cognizant of such differences and should be accomodating and should make way for special provisions wherever applicable.
Other minor issues such as uniform testing practices and test timings could pose challenges to the test administration body.
I would not completely favor the uniform curriculum without the details of the flexibilities it has in place.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | AlmeeC. | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lekuleku | 62 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | nikhil40507 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | greuela001 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | vineel | 58 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 83
- Issue Essay:-People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 16
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 58
- Issue Essay:-People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 16
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 58
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.261176470588 0.240241500013 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.134117647059 0.157235817809 85% => OK
Adjectives: 0.136470588235 0.0880659088768 155% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0305882352941 0.0497285424764 62% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0258823529412 0.0444667217837 58% => OK
Prepositions: 0.112941176471 0.12292977631 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0376470588235 0.0406280797675 93% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.98176988697 2.79330140395 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0305882352941 0.030933414821 99% => OK
Particles: 0.00235294117647 0.0016655270985 141% => OK
Determiners: 0.103529411765 0.0997080785238 104% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0494117647059 0.0249443105267 198% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0188235294118 0.0148568991511 127% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2572.0 2732.02544248 94% => OK
No of words: 397.0 452.878318584 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.47858942065 6.0361032391 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.58838876751 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.448362720403 0.366273622748 122% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.372795969773 0.280924506359 133% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.264483627204 0.200843997647 132% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.171284634761 0.132149295362 130% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98176988697 2.79330140395 107% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 219.290929204 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518891687657 0.48968727796 106% => OK
Word variations: 57.5196926135 55.4138127331 104% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0555555556 23.380412469 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1009979841 59.4972553346 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.888888889 141.124799967 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0555555556 23.380412469 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.444444444444 0.674092028746 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 11.0 4.94800884956 222% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.21349557522 0% => OK
Readability: 59.3351525329 51.4728631049 115% => OK
Elegance: 2.16049382716 1.64882698954 131% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360423341487 0.391690518653 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0906458679261 0.123202303941 74% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0637959418799 0.077325440228 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.750080198592 0.547984918172 137% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.173850644668 0.149214159877 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145125357164 0.161403998019 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063313705266 0.0892212321368 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.19547815619 0.385218514788 51% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0914391521943 0.0692045440612 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175524830382 0.275328986314 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774756427824 0.0653680567796 119% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 12.0 7.22455752212 166% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.5995575221 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.