A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
The issue at hand is accompanied with considerable complexities, and any position taken is definitely littered with its own advantages and disadvantages. However, I am making a case to say yes, students should be required to study a national curriculum until they enter college. Generally, at such an early age people rarely know what they want in the long run, also, there is considarable need for individuals who are not oblivious of art at the expense of science nor vice versa. It is on this ground that I am agreeing with the position.
Firstly, students need to be exposed to options in order to know which one is good for them. Early specialization might result is wrong choices and the blame might be on the fact that "I didn't know such option existed." Even at the graduate school level, we still have his fundamental philosophy at play when in the first year of a PhD education all intakes are required to study same courses. This further stress the importance of common knowledge in society. If students are allowed the option of doing all as defined in a national curriculum, it will inform a better choice of specialization in college.
Secondly, as society becomes more complex and the thin-line between what is required of scientist and a journalist continues to fade, the need for individuals to possess at least a minimum knowledge of all field possible begins to rise. If students are therefore mandated to follow a curriculum that encourages only specific knowledge early on, it might deprive them of the golden opportunity to learn about the dynamics of functioning in a complex society. Students therefore, should be allowed to follow a national curriculum until college.
An opposing view might want to claim the statistics of Malcom Gladwell that says it requires approximately 10,000 hours to become an expert in a field of study. This view will be immediately flawed on arrival however. Take for example, I have switched from three different career in a space of 5 years, while I might not have become stella in any of this field, I have made a mark and added unequal experience that made me ready to properly function as an entreprenur which is the ultimate goal.
In light of the foregoing, it is a great idea to allow stuedents focus on the national curicullum while they specialize at the college level. This will allow them to be aware of options avalialble and give room for general knowledge needed to function in a complex society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | AlmeeC. | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lekuleku | 62 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | nikhil40507 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | greuela001 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | vineel | 58 | view |
- "Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the 59
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 511, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...vice versa. It is on this ground that I am agreeing with the position. Firstly, studen...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...blame might be on the fact that 'I didnt know such option existed.' Even at...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, while, at least, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2073.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 422.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91232227488 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84687509088 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53317535545 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.9449537577 60.3974514979 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.5625 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 5.21951772744 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278107846612 0.243740707755 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990860452975 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150024835614 0.0758088955206 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146044726685 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0890598420964 0.0667264976115 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.