A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
I partially agree to the statement that a nation should have all of its students study the same national curriculum. It is true that the fundamental knowledge required for all of the students are generally provided in the curriculum and thus this ensures that everyone has the basic knowledge. However, the more diversified the courses are, there will be greater chances of producing differently capabled individuals who can contribute to more varying fields for the development of the country.
Before college, the courses that are taught are generally for building fundamental and basic knowledge among the students. Following a particular prescribed curriculum will help ensuring that all the students have the necessary general knowledge. This can help students on an individual level as well. When students finish school level studies they will be more clear on what to pursue as their future. They can then choose a more specified schooling on the college levels. This approach can help students by guiding them on a pre-determined path until they are able to choose on their own.
However, this also on some levels, can hinder diversity of interests in the nation. When the same curriculum is taught among all the students in the nation, we will have also confined the knowledge base of all the students. This dampens the possibilty of unique individuals. A more positive side to this approach is when different schools employ different curriculum according to their needs, there is a possibility of healthy and fruitful competition in the nation and in turn this will help individual and national growth. This approach will ensure diversity of talents in the nation.
In the conclusion, both approaches have their own positive and negative sides. A more beneficial solution could be to follow the nation's curriculum to ensure a general fundamental base among the students, and at the same time, allow the schools to include other pecurial courses on their own. When we include both the fundamentals and other fields of interests, we can fill in the deficiency of being biased on either of the approach.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | AlmeeC. | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lekuleku | 62 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | nikhil40507 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | greuela001 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | vineel | 58 | view |
- “Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station’s coverage of w 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... the fundamental knowledge required for all of the students are generally provided in the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to ensure' or 'ensure'.
Suggestion: to ensure; ensure
...ticular prescribed curriculum will help ensuring that all the students have the necessar...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 130, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...eficial solution could be to follow the nations curriculum to ensure a general fundamen...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, thus, well, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 344.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18023255814 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78616395295 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 215.323595506 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46511627907 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 556.2 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5113210938 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.823529412 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2352941176 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.29411764706 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313624985632 0.243740707755 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109210741981 0.0831039109588 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129336266136 0.0758088955206 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197849359497 0.150359130593 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0944484620373 0.0667264976115 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.