Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">
The author of the statement claim that nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain. While some may argue that this statement holds all the time, others may counter that claim by providing examples in support of their claim. In my essay, I will highlight both sides of the argument, and also provide sound reasoning for my claim.
From the past few decades, the actions of a human being had the worst effect on the environment. Today because of the pollution, deforestation, and the industrialization, we are facing problem like climate change(Global warming) and now we are facing the result of what we did or doing with the environment for example, in Europe, most of the countries are badly affected by the heat waves, more 50 people lost their lives because of the heat waves. And the condition became even more worst when a country starts its development at or near the natural site.
The above mention point supports that the government should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state. But we cannot deny that development is important for humankind and the economy of a country. And if some areas are just preserved regardless of anything as it is a natural site it will be unbeneficial. Before developing these areas the government should find out whether not developing the natural state, will the government make their loss or not. Because in today's competitive world, no country doesn't want to stay behind from others in any field.
In a nutshell, we can say that human activities hurt the environment, but development is a need for a country. So, the government should find out some solutions to do development work in these states with minimal effect on wildlife. </span>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | wenki31 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | Md. Kawsar Ahmed | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | chapagain08 | 50 | view |
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 66
- Arctic deer live on islands in Canada's arctic regions. They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year. Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enoug 50
- In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years. 58
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field. 50
- Arctic deer live on islands in Canada's arctic regions. They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year. Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enoug 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...angeGlobal warming and now we are facing the result of what we did or doing with ...
^^
Line 4, column 480, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'worst' (without 'more') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: worst
...at waves. And the condition became even more worst when a country starts its development a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 535, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...in todays competitive world, no country doesnt want to stay behind from others in any ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... stay behind from others in any field. In a nutshell, we can say that human act...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 311.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04823151125 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95244792494 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556270096463 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.0964677634 60.3974514979 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.769230769 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9230769231 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.23076923077 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.48775849446 0.243740707755 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161293987044 0.0831039109588 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.19446062544 0.0758088955206 257% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219807399322 0.150359130593 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.190466400263 0.0667264976115 285% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.