Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Any animals are part of our life. If they are forest animal or our pets. Many animals are friends even many people are emotionally attached with their pets. Animals are leaving without speaking but many people believes they are more faithful than humans. They cannot speak but everything listen and aware of it. Therefore, any nations indeed pass law to preserve wild ares in their natural state. In addition that, the author adds, even if that areas are under developed for economic gain. So, they need to find out other way to solve this problem. I am totally agree with this author assertion.
Many nations cut trees of forest for their economical gain or any beneficial result. These type of actions give two main harmful results. First, forests are our natural property, they provide many things that human cannot completely take place. Forests are give important and integral for our life is that pure air. They balance our pure and impure air in atmosphere. Without pure air we can't leave and for impure air human are responsible. Pollution cause global effect and that is balanced by forest. Second, as a result of cutting forest, they are not only cut trees but also takes homes of animals, birds and many more.
Although, i concede that sometimes wild animals are harmful for nearest leaving people in that area. So, Nations need to take step that reduce or diminish that cause.
In conclusion, animals essential part of our life. Hence, Nations need to take step against people that killing animals for their fun or any reason and preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their state. That may be harmful but rather than they gives many necessary things for our leaving.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | wenki31 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | Md. Kawsar Ahmed | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | chapagain08 | 50 | view |
- Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the numbe 50
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 50
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 58
- "Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the numb 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 401, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...ve wild ares in their natural state. In addition that, the author adds, even if that are...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 563, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...way to solve this problem. I am totally agree with this author assertion. Many nat...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 389, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... air in atmosphere. Without pure air we cant leave and for impure air human are resp...
^^^^
Line 5, column 11, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...mals, birds and many more. Although, i concede that sometimes wild animals are...
^
Line 7, column 250, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'give'
Suggestion: give
...hat may be harmful but rather than they gives many necessary things for our leaving. ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, second, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 58.6224719101 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 287.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90592334495 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20795430659 2.79657885939 79% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547038327526 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.5651712451 60.3974514979 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 64.0 118.986275619 54% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.0454545455 23.4991977007 56% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271029401438 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749022957722 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110608436386 0.0758088955206 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173227785004 0.150359130593 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.075443557738 0.0667264976115 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 14.1392134831 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 48.8420337079 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.31 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.8971910112 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.