As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The author states that the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate, as people rely more and more on technology to solve problems. While the both sides of the statement have its strengths and weaknesses, I believe that the excessive use of technology will deteriorate the thinking ability of humans, because it is easy to perform a task using technology, while it takes a lot more effort to solve that particular task by humans on their own. Moreover, technology has the characteristics of getting better with time and humans are suffering to keep up with them.
First, we are using technology in almost every field, from manufacturing plant to precision work to self driving car, because technology is making everything easy. For example, in garments industry, humans were used for sewing and cutting operation. But recently robots are introduced here because of their superior performance. Furthermore, the defect rates of products are reduced dramatically when they robots are involved. So, in case of sewing and cutting operation, the humans are not involved anymore. As a result, they are not thinking about making themselves more skilled, and how can they increase productivity with their human limitations.
Second, artificial intelligence is solving a great deal of problems. For example, a poem or painting can be done with artificial intelligence. Similarly, artificial intelligence is performing very well in video games, even it is beating humans regularly in some games. Consequently, the complicated works which required a lot more thinking and brainstorming of humans, are being handed over to technology.
Some may argue that although technology is getting advanced day by day, some problems are still can't be solved by technology. For example, the job of a judge. While the argument is valid, it is flawed, because the human judge may not be replaced by technology, but the judicial process is gaining a lot from technology, for example - voice recognition, face recognition etc. which is helping to decrease the pressure on humans.
In conclusion, humans are relying more and more on technology day by day. As a result, their ability to think for themselves are getting hampered because the humans take a lot more time and resource to perform any particular task while technology can perform it with lot less.
- We learn our most valuable lessons in life from struggling with our limitations rather than from enjoying our successes.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your posit 50
- "Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station's coverage of 63
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 58
- gh 16
- Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
... handed over to technology. Some may argue that although technology is getting adv...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 97, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ced day by day, some problems are still cant be solved by technology. For example, t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 97, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'canted'.
Suggestion: canted
...ced day by day, some problems are still cant be solved by technology. For example, t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, similarly, so, still, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1987.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 379.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24274406332 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96224979074 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511873350923 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 64.9163109228 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.578947368 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9473684211 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36842105263 5.21951772744 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311238995503 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984136448221 0.0831039109588 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110313364599 0.0758088955206 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181326095159 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0995648709169 0.0667264976115 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.