Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Government is integral part of a country which is responsible for preservation of art and cultural values, not only for protecting the identity of the nation but also to upgrade the work of art throughout the country’s populace. The funding of the arts from the government help art be flourish and available to all the people. The funding ensures the protection and encouragement for further development of the art.
Art can be found in different aspects of work and lifestyles, from crating statue from wood to traditional dances. For instance, In Bhaktapur district of country Nepal, There are peoples who mould pots and other dishes from mud with a traditional pot making equipment. We would be using modern dishes at our homes, but these pots made up of mud represents the work of art with immense cultural value. Government should always stay active to fund such arts and help them flourish and make available to the peoples. It would not only reflect the culture of our country but also encourages the community to burgeon their art.
Also, Art can be in other form like literature, poetry, dance, sports, technology and so on. If we look at the history of the world, development of every country is the result of profound use of art and knowledge.The encouragement on the use of art and knowledge is tacitly the beneficial medium of development of the country. For example, Cricket has been recently popular in Nepal after a Nepali team begun to play game with international country. Government has done sufficient fund for its flourish at its nascent time. Nowadays, as a result, there has been plan made to develop an international cricket stadium inside the country.
Some people argue that the funding done by government threatens the integrity of art, which could be true when government intend to have desired result from funding within some arbitrary year. In fact, rather such government should focus more on development of art.
In conclusion, The funding made by government to the arts is necessary to ensure art to be flourished and widely available which could serve the growth of artist and also eventually promotes the art and culture of the country.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people enjoy life more than older people do.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples. 73
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting yo 58
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the comp 77
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the 58
- Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...lt of profound use of art and knowledge.The encouragement on the use of art and kno...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 33.0505617978 33% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1824.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 365.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99726027397 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80323111963 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504109589041 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1043190859 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8125 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4375 5.21951772744 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.4815026931 0.243740707755 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179986518254 0.0831039109588 217% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149306669358 0.0758088955206 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.321503304226 0.150359130593 214% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102664615346 0.0667264976115 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.