Technology causes more problems for modern societies than it solves.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compelling reasons a

Essay topics:

Technology causes more problems for modern societies than it solves.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your positions.

Technology, in my opinion, is a savior of all the world’s problems. While it is undeniable that the present problems in a society would not have existed if technology hadn’t penetrated this deeply, it is also irrefutable that human life would have long gone if it weren’t for technology. Therefore, it is essential to understand the pros and cons before judging the ominous effects of technology.

Climate crisis is no doubt the most pressing problem in the world today. This man-made problem is caused by excessive emission of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, sulphur dioxide, and chlorofluorocarbons into the atmosphere. While motor vehicles are responsible for carbon dioxide and sulphur dioxide in the air, refrigerators and air conditioners release chlorofluorocarbons. However, a retrospection clearly says that motor vehicles had come in the first place when humans were in dire need of a means of faster transportation and refrigerators and air conditioners to enable us to store food. One cannot argue that these are unnecessary. In this case, it is clear that it is the human’s insatiable desire which brought this endangering situation. If we had restrained ourselves to public transport than to buy personal vehicles, we would not have landed in this crisis and in other problems such as pollution, and traffic congestion.

Another major problem in the present society is anxiety in people, which is often attributed to social media. Social media enabled faster communication between people who are present in any part of the world. But, people wanted more from it. Companies identified this need and then came cell phones which eventually added to the traditional list of basic needs. With the integration of the internet and cellphones, the ramifications were gloomy. As per a survey by NYU, more than 90 percent of children who have cell phones are suffering from one or other types of anxieties. Ironically, the results indicated that the distance between people has increased more than ever before. Furthermore, the number of cyberbullying cases is skyrocketing every day which is leading to depression and other mental disorders even in adults. After all, it is not an exaggeration to say that the word psychiatry came into existence in the 19th century, which was the time when telephones in the household are on the rise. While it is obvious that social media is to be blamed in this case, a simple question vindicates social media from this accusation. If people had resorted to moderate use of social media, would this situation arise?

To sum up, by nature, technology is pervasive and humans are gullible which entangles humans in the technology. Technology helped us to evolve in the situations which were once unfathomable. From allowing us to fly in the skies to enabling us to feed the burgeoning population, technology had been helpful throughout this journey of mankind. Therefore, rather than blaming technology for what we had done to ourselves, we should learn to control our desires to make proper use of anything.

Votes
Average: 6.2 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-30 Abraham04 58 view
2024-06-29 sefeliz 83 view
2024-06-29 sefeliz 83 view
2024-06-10 HAN YEBIN 50 view
2024-06-10 HAN YEBIN 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user mjnravi :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, then, therefore, while, after all, no doubt, such as, in my opinion, to sum up, in the first place

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2589.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 497.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2092555332 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07746067776 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539235412475 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 828.0 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.1235742646 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.56 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.88 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142963315312 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038734938345 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0292672258098 0.0758088955206 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0819166477909 0.150359130593 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235913056062 0.0667264976115 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 100.480337079 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.