To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
I fundamentally agree with the claim that meaningful features of the nation are observed in its big cities. By the innate feature of capitals aggregating to a specific center, the mainstream trend of people and technical developments are lucidly observed in major cities. However, an investigation about whether society is centralized or not is indispensable before starting the main evaluation.
The primary reason why I agree with the given statement is that most citizens, who consist the society actually, live in major cities. The lifestyle of citizens is one of the indispensable checkpoints when we investigate a nation. As the city grows larger and larger, its influence on other small cities increases very rapidly. The significant portion of people who have their jobs in metropolitan city does not live in the city. In the weekend, so many people clouded in front of the department store would be residents in the next city of the metropolitan city. Because the capitals and industries are becoming extremely centralized, the actual number of people who have their basis on the metropolitan city easily surpasses the number of people that is written on a residents report. thus to investigate the dominant lifestyle in the nation, the investigator should examine the metropolitan city.
In the context of centralization, we can also seek the political and technical advances that are achieved in society. The newly developed technic and technical infrastructures are often provided in the capital city first. The first subway system of the nation has been installed in its capital city with no exception in any country worldwide. it is common in a small town there’s no subway system installed, and the society only composed by small cities would have no subway system in the nation, like swiss or Luxembourg in real. Then, is it justifiable to insist that the metro infrastructure of swiss and England is comparable after looking for the small town in two countries? one similar example in political executions also substantiates the reasoning of this paragraph. In South Korea, the capital city, Seoul, has executed the emergency prohibition inhibiting the drive of old cars for reducing the dust level in the city. A few months later, other cities nationwide copied the instruction after evaluating the efficiency of it. In a centralized society, the advances in major cities aptly illustrate the overall technical and social development of the society, and even investigating small cities only can lead to an erroneous conclusion.
Nevertheless, I note that these principles are justified in special situations solely. In the cases of decentralized society, accepting the strong recommendation that assures to study the major cities is somewhat bothersome. The previous example considering swiss or Luxembourg depicts that it is unnecessary to study the major cities in a decentralized society. There can be a society consisted of small towns, thus the difference between the largest city and others is trivial. In conclusion, the maintenance is regarded as premature if the evaluation of the society considering its centralization is yet invalid.
In sum, caused by an extreme centralization of modern industries and capitalism, the investigation of major cities has become more crucial to understand the whole nation.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-27 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
2020-01-26 | snowsss | 50 | view |
2020-01-26 | snowsss | 50 | view |
2020-01-22 | nikhil40507 | 33 | view |
2020-01-16 | satyam63 | 50 | view |
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelli 66
- Educational Institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 16
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 16
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 66
- A nation should require all of it students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position y 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 788, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
... that is written on a residents report. thus to investigate the dominant lifestyle i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 788, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: thus,
... that is written on a residents report. thus to investigate the dominant lifestyle i...
^^^^
Line 5, column 344, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... no exception in any country worldwide. it is common in a small town there's ...
^^
Line 5, column 687, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...ng for the small town in two countries? one similar example in political executions...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, then, thus, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2825.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 527.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3605313093 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79129216042 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14680353003 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489563567362 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 918.0 704.065955056 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 15.0 4.99550561798 300% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.434536825 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.0 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.08 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102158566734 0.243740707755 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.033169153236 0.0831039109588 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398004121949 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0621560780591 0.150359130593 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0128906528023 0.0667264976115 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 151.0 100.480337079 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.