To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
One needs to study major cities of a country if they want to know about its cultural, economic, political and other major aspects. How far is this true? This is asserted by the speaker of the given issue topic. In my opinion major cities of a country only gives you a peripheral view of what is actually hidden inside.
To begin with this, important cities of a country can be sometimes called as quintessence of art and cultural values of the country, but the real beauty or elaboration can only be found in its base that is villages or small towns. Countryside areas have been there since a very long time; undisturbed and thus stand as perfect examples. For instance, if one visits India for the first time, they will first visit metro cities like Mumbai, Delhi etc. that have been inured to modernization and will get to know only about that part of the country. Since India is a diverse and cosmopolitan country it consists of various cultures, languages, morals, beliefs and many more which can only be seen in the depths of the country. With this point, I can say that studying only major parts of the country will never give you detailed data about that particular company.
Many critics can argue that cities are the only place where people from all the cultures or foreign cultures can be found, as it is the first place they would want to go. But as I have given an example above, I can assert that major parts of a city can be an asset to learn about the country but it will not provide you with all the details. Population in major cities is really growing every day and it is causing a confusing crowd there which can provide very intricated and complex data about the country.
In the conclusion, I can say stoutly that one needs to have thorough knowledge of every small part of the country to know about its positive- negative, strengths and weaknesses, achievements and failure and so on. Only cursory knowledge would go in vain if you do not know actually what is in its depths.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | snowsss | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | snowsss | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | nikhil40507 | 33 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | satyam63 | 50 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, really, so, thus, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 361.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5595567867 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39227751102 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490304709141 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7320746912 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.733333333 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0666666667 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 5.21951772744 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137705631923 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509428584862 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043125954896 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0962849080659 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0164981892219 0.0667264976115 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 12.1639044944 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.