The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
We have to admit that we are living in a more and more comfortable and convenient world, no oppression and poverty as our ancestors suffered which is largely due to the efforts that scientists jump out of the confinement of authority, that the public oppugns the authoritarians in a nation to seek for democracy, equality, freedom, that youngsters dare to break through stereotypes from their parent, teachers, and other instructors. But all of these challenges against the authority does not mean that this intends to induce conflicts, turbulence, or is an absurd behavior, but enhance the well-being of the overall society.
Not confined with the authority, the majority of scientists always remain their curiosity to their research fields, either finding new laws or confirming the false of previous conclusions in this way that they disclose us something about the nature and solve problems one after another in the process of social development. Galileo, for instance, kept his doubt about Aristotle's law of gravity, which was regarded as the classics in physics at that time, and overthrew Aristotle's law of gravity with the law of free fall in this way that he became the pioneer in modern natural science, radically changing people's knowledge about the cosmos and the motion of matter. Another example is Yuan Longping, who has cultivated hybrid rice more than 1,000 kg per mu, getting rid of the shackle of popular views of classical genetics, and now is developing a kind of high-salt-tolerant sea rice more than 300 kg per mu, turning saline-alkali land to arable land. These scientific breakthrough will benefit next generations.
Strengthened by the democratic consciousness, the public nowadays has passionately participated in the policy-making process with the government, opposing unreasonable policies and supervising the operation of governmental organization in order to promote the public welfare. A typical case is that people propel the development of an equal, honest society, by violently querying the policies the corrupt officials make either for themselves or for vested interest groups, or the officials' incompetence. In reality, the more the public questions the authorities, the better the society develops, such as China, America.
Today's youngsters, the future generation burdening social progress on their shoulders, are pride of their critical thinking and of their independent judgment, no longer subservient to their elders' wills and orders as before. In their opinion, seniors, though well-intended, sophisticated, sometimes make mistakes when they guide their children——after all too err is human; and even if what seniors say is truth, the more it is debated, the clear it is. Therefore, future generations with creativity, critical analysis will really be of enough capability to push the society forward.
However, the above-mentioned means of questioning the authority does not mean that they deliberately resist in the authority, or make conflicts or trouble with the authorities, but express their viewpoints after considerably in-depth analysis so that things will go towards a better direction. Sometimes, though this query may produce uncomfortable effects, it, if treated properly, will be beneficial to the sustainability and prosperity of the society.
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves. 58
- Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning. 66
- every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws. 66
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals. 66
- "Over the past ten years, there has been a 20 percent decline in the size of the average audience at Classical Shakespeare Theatre productions. In spite of increased advertising, we are attracting fewer and fewer people to our shows, causing our profits t 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 481, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'officials'' or 'official's'?
Suggestion: officials'; official's
...s or for vested interest groups, or the officials incompetence. In reality, the more the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 356, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to err'?
Suggestion: to err
...en they guide their children——after all too err is human; and even if what seniors say ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, really, so, then, therefore, well, after all, for instance, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2813.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 508.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5374015748 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74751043592 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19971640952 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 301.0 215.323595506 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592519685039 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 860.4 704.065955056 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.77640449438 563% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => OK
Sentence length: 36.0 23.0359550562 156% => OK
Sentence length SD: 96.356825161 60.3974514979 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 200.928571429 118.986275619 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.2857142857 23.4991977007 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 5.21951772744 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138619541228 0.243740707755 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044846367111 0.0831039109588 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406880296202 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.068733011854 0.150359130593 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258012768738 0.0667264976115 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.8 14.1392134831 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.48 48.8420337079 54% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 12.1743820225 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.1639044944 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.86 8.38706741573 129% => OK
difficult_words: 175.0 100.480337079 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 29.5 11.8971910112 248% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 16.4 11.2143820225 146% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.