the amount of electricity produced by 4 different sources
The graph illustrates the amount of electricity produced by 4 different sources in France over a period of 30 years.
Overall, while the amount of Nuclear and Renewables electricity increased, the opposite was true for Thermal and Hydroelectric over the period. Also, electricity generated by Nuclear was the most common source for most of the period.
In 1980, the figure for Nuclear electricity production started at 50 Terawat hours (TW-h), compared with the negligible amount of electriciy produced by Renewables. The figure for Nuclear electricity rose rapidly to reach a peak of around 450 TW-h in 2005 before decreasing slightly to roughly 430TW-h in 2010. By contrast, the amount of Renewables electricity remained stable until 2005, followed by a moderate growth of 25 TW-h in the last year.
Looking at other electricity sources, the amount of Thermal electricity was highest with about 120 TW-h in 1980 while the figure for Hydroelectric was 50 TW-h. Over the next 30 years, the figures for both Thermal and Hydroelectric witnessed many minor fluctuations and then ended at around 50 TW-h in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-10 | phạm khánh linh | 60 | view |
| 2024-03-26 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-11 | lethianhthu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-17 | honguyenlily | 67 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | AhaanIshaan | 11 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 939.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24581005587 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91113453573 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525139664804 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.4610774452 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.375 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322396815591 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166464237306 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143528636656 0.0843802449381 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248015126226 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.159068578613 0.0819641961636 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.