The bar chart below gives information about water use in China, USA, Russia and Australia in 2010.
The chart given depicts the amount of water usage in 4 distinct nations, namely China, USA, Russia and Australia in 2010.
Most strikingly, while people in USA and Russia tended to use most of their water for industry, the opposite was true for that in China and Australia. Moreover, the vast majority of water was used for Agriculture in China.
As far as the statistics is concerned, the figure for water usage in USA and Russia had the same scenario since the amount of water used for Industry in both of them accounted for the largest percentage, which is roughly 45% and 60%, respectively and followed by Agriculture and Domestic. Moreover, 39% was the portion of water used for agriculture in USA and 30% was that in Russia. The figure for water usage in domestic in USA was roughly 2 in 10, which was 2 times as large as that in Russia, with a very small number of 10%.
Regarding the remainder, while the amount of water used for Agriculture in China contributed to the largest portion (at around 85%), Domestic was the section that consumed most of water in Australia (60%). Lastly, the figure for water usage for Industry in both nation shared approximately portion of 7% in China and 4% in Australia.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-03 | Thùy Linh 1494 | view | |
| 2021-07-02 | Thùy Linh 1494 | view | |
| 2020-08-08 | longle251198 | 67 | view |
| 2020-02-15 | Lam Pham | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-12 | lauranguyen_97 | 78 | view |
- The maps below show the changes in the art gallery ground floor in 2015 and present day 73
- Some people believe that government spending on the care of the elderly should be priority Others think government spending should be more focused on the education of the young people Discuss both views and give your own opinion 72
- In certain countries unemployment is so high that some have suggested children should stop their education after primary school to learn skills necessary to join the workforce Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that in order to deal with the problem of congestion in cities privately owned vehicles should be banned in city centres while others consider this to be an unrealistic solution Discuss both sides and give your opinion 78
- The chart below show the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in 5 Australian cities 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, lastly, moreover, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66822429907 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57398600723 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453271028037 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.6551991199 43.030603864 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.875 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29001213833 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176345116526 0.103423049105 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753550031607 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235448924647 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0726875939378 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.