The bar chart below shows the number of students who chose certain university subjects in 2005.
The bar chart shows the numbers (in thousands) of students who chose to study different university subjects in 2005. The numbers for each subject are divided into male and female students and show some general differences between men’s and women’s choice of subjects.
Science and Maths were the most popular choices for male students in 2005, but nonscience subjects were more popular with female students. The most popular subjects for female students were less technical subjects such as social sciences, languages, literature, and humanities. Social sciences were by far the most popular subject for women. However, very few female students chose to study mathematics and law: four and six thousand students respectively. Almost no men - only two thousand - chose to study languages and very few men chose the arts. However, just as many men as women chose to study humanities.
- The table below shows the television viewing figures for sports by country, in millions 22
- The bar chart below shows the number of students who chose certain university subjects in 2005 73
- The table below shows the television viewing figures for sports by country, in millions 56
- The bar chart below shows the number of students who chose certain university subjects in 2005. 56
- Young people should spend more time on music and theater and less time on sport. How far do you agree with this statement? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 33.7804878049 38% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 751.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 140.0 196.424390244 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36428571429 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.43979062825 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65021810812 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5389232833 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.875 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323868653255 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167241584859 0.103423049105 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.192858094605 0.0843802449381 229% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.310182157807 0.15604864568 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14627025789 0.0819641961636 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.