The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in 5 different age groups in the USA between 1850 and 2000.
The bar chart illustrates that proportion of dwellers who lived isolate in different age group in USA between 1850 to 2000.
Overall, it is clear that only the three group over 37 years lived isolated in 1850 while by passing the time number of groups were increased in 2000. During the period of 150 years percentage increased in all kind of age group.
According to older people who represented the age group of 55-64, accounted for about 3% in 1850. Before experiencing an increase rapidly in 2000 to 17%, the figure stood above at 3% in 1900 and 9% in 1950. Meantime, only above 2% of age group of 47-54 stayed alone. Afterwards, it increased slightly by 1% until 1950 and then it rose drastically with 13% in 2000.
During the 150 years of period, the trend which represent for age group of 37-46 went up gradually and stood at only 7% in 2000,. Regarding 17-26 and 27-36 aged people. The figure for both were not shown in 1850 since, only 17-26, aged people were not lived isolated in 1900 as well as the proportion for 27-36 age group accounted for about above 2% in 1900. Following 50 years, pattern for 27-36 age group climbed slightly to 2.2% whereas only under 2% people lived alone in 1950. There was rocket in figure for your people and situated at 8% in 2000 compared with only 5% for 17-26 years group that was the lowest figure for the year 2000.
- The Table below shows the results of a survey that asked 6800 Scottish adults (aged 16 years and over) whether they had taken part in different cultural activities in the past 12 months. 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in 5 different age groups in the USA between 1850 and 2000. 73
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. 84
- Development in technology has brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and give 87
- Scientist agree that people are damaging their health by eating too much junk food. Some people think that the answer to this problem is to educate people. Others think education will not work. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 276, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... people were not lived isolated in 1900 as well as the proportion for 27-36 age group acco...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 547, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re for your people and situated at 8% in 2000 compared with only 5% for 17-26 yea...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, then, well, whereas, while, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1124.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53225806452 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24141326013 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512096774194 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9887349023 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6666666667 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340288741405 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14372905119 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118593361755 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264928075267 0.15604864568 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138501770252 0.0819641961636 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.