The bar chart below shows the types of music bought in the USA in 2010 by age group Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The bar chart below shows the types of music bought in the USA in 2010 by age group. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart illustrates the types of music bought by American people in the year 2010, divided into five age groups.

Overall, the highest numbers of sold albums were in Rock and Classical productions. Meanwhile, the respective figure for Pop music albums has many noticeable fluctuations, whereas Jazz music just fluctuated slightly in the total sold recordings.

In particular, the Rock recordings that sold out to people from the age of 16-22 were approximate four million placed at the second rank and then rose inconsiderably to just over four million for the age of 23-31-year-olds that made it become the highest numbers in comparison with others figures until the age of 46-57-year-olds. As the same time, the figures in sold Classical songs tended to increase throughout the rise of ages, from just under two million in the age of 16-22-year-olds to almost 4,5 million in the over 58-year-olds group, stayed at the highest place of USA sales of recordings in this age.

Pop music possessed the highest number of buyers in the 16-22 age group with just under five million sold recordings, but then witnessed a considerable decrease in the next ages from 23-57-year-olds and eventually rose slightly to exact three million in the age of over 58-year-olds. In contrast, the number of American who bought jazz music recordings fluctuated constantly, from two million for 16-22-year-olds to under three million for over 58-year-olds group.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (4 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-04-11 minhnhat2002 61 view
2021-02-17 nmengg 60 view
2020-01-21 Tan Thao 79 view
Essays by user Tan Thao :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, so, then, whereas, while, in contrast, in particular

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1227.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24358974359 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08463243596 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495726495726 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 352.8 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.6015977606 43.030603864 201% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 175.285714286 112.824112599 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.4285714286 22.9334400587 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131889594637 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828397384906 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723006382158 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113234278795 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0803657555467 0.0819641961636 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.2329268293 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.