The bar chart compares the volume of rentals and sales of films over the course of a decade in a specific shop.
The bar chart compares the volume of rentals and sales of films over the course of a decade in a specific shop.
Overall, while the DVD sales experienced a considerable raise from 2002 to 2011, rentals and VHS sales number diminished significantly.
Looking at the graph, it is crystal clear that rentals had the highest number in 2002 constituting slightly above 150000 and followed by VHS sales and DVD sales with nearly 80000 and 45000. Regarding the VHS sales, by 2005 it had reached to its lowest amount with 10000 before omitting completely to the rest of the period.
Conversely, DVD sales faced a dramatic rise and reached to its peak in 2007 accounting for slightly above 200000 and had followed by a moderate drop by 2011, making slightly below 180000. Blu-ray sales, on the other hand, initiated in 2007 with an insignificant number and went up consistently and moderately making around 10000 in 2011.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-03-31 | Mohammad Khaleghi Esfahani | 61 | view |
- Due to the fact that in order to produce in order to produce meat normally more area will be needed in comparison with a crop, some people aver that meat usage should be diminished in all corner of the world. 73
- In the new millennium, many people select to travel by their own four-wheel vehicle or tram. 73
- The bar chart compares the volume of smartphones and landlines per 100 people in seven nations. 78
- It is true that disabled people encounter various difficulties in their lives in all corner of the world. 78
- In the new millennium and by the advent of the internet almost every sphere of human lives has been altered in some ways. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, look, regarding, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 763.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92258064516 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65842465459 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587096774194 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 216.0 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.6453409049 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.166666667 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8333333333 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290196089452 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.207015633544 0.103423049105 200% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.357426440013 0.0843802449381 424% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.301326306891 0.15604864568 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.404791015238 0.0819641961636 494% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.